Interactive Transcript
0:01
So this is a typical case of a
0:03
patient who presented with aphasia.
0:05
When we consider aphasia, we're always concerned about
0:08
a left middle cerebral artery distribution infarction,
0:12
and that's because most right-handed people have
0:15
language largely on the left side of the brain.
0:20
So that might be different in a left-handed
0:22
individual, in which case it may either be
0:25
balanced, or it may be on the right side of the brain.
0:28
Um, so anyway, as we would normally do, I
0:32
would start with looking at the thick-section
0:35
images, basically to look for hemorrhage.
0:39
One of the most important things that we're going to
0:41
be doing in patients who we're considering stroke is
0:44
to look for hemorrhage, because that would prevent
0:49
the patient from being considered for thrombolytic
0:53
therapy, or in most cases, for thrombectomy.
0:56
So the presence of hemorrhage
0:58
is the most important thing.
0:59
And so we're gonna look on the thick-section images.
1:02
So this is the axial scan through this patient.
1:04
And as we look at the patient's study, we notice
1:07
that there are areas of low density in the patient's
1:10
brain, both in the putamen region on the left
1:14
side, as well as in the left frontal region.
1:17
Looks like the patient has had a prior craniotomy, but
1:20
what I'm not seeing is any evidence of hemorrhage.
1:23
So this patient, a priori, may be a candidate
1:28
for getting IV tPA, the tissue plasminogen
1:33
activator factor, or potentially thrombectomy.
1:37
The next thing we want to do, so we want to see
1:40
whether there's any mass effect, because if the
1:42
patient is herniating, obviously that's another
1:45
emergency, in which case the patient may need
1:48
either a craniectomy to reduce the mass effect
1:52
or even potentially steroids.
1:54
So as we look at these thick section
1:56
images, we are not seeing mass effect,
1:59
midline shift, or herniation of structures.
2:03
The next thing we want to do is try to
2:05
see if we can identify the thrombus, because if we can
2:08
identify the thrombus itself and where it's located,
2:12
it will be helpful to the interventionalists
2:15
for deciding whether or not to go after it.
2:17
Obviously, if it's far peripheral
2:20
in the vasculature, it's much harder to find and get to,
2:24
whereas those lesions that are proximal in the
2:28
internal carotid artery or in the M1 segment of the
2:31
middle cerebral artery have a better success rate.
2:35
So for that, I would switch to the thin section images.
2:38
So these are the thick section images that are
2:40
approximately five millimeters thick, as you can
2:44
tell.
2:45
And now what I'm going to look
2:46
at are the thin section images.
2:48
This is 351 images.
2:51
The previous dataset was 36 images.
2:54
So as I scroll through these images, I'm
2:57
going to be very cognizant of the density
3:01
of the internal carotid artery bilaterally,
3:05
as well as the middle cerebral arteries.
3:08
Now, what you'll see is that there's going
3:10
to be some calcification of atherosclerosis.
3:13
That typically occurs in the cavernous internal
3:16
carotid arteries, which is what we are seeing
3:18
on either side—the right and the left
3:21
internal carotid artery in the cavernous sinus.
3:24
But as we continue further superiorly, what we notice
3:29
is this hyperdense area in the expected location of
3:33
the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery. This is in
3:37
a location that is definitely amenable to thrombectomy,
3:41
and although the patient does have prior strokes,
3:44
those low-density areas—we might be able to save a
3:49
large area of the middle cerebral artery distribution
3:52
by virtue of removing that thrombus in a timely fashion.
3:57
So, at this juncture, I've identified a dense MCA.
4:02
I've seen older areas of encephalomalacia, likely from a
4:07
craniotomy, as well as an infarction in the left putamen.
4:12
That's old.
4:13
Why do I say old?
4:14
Because it's low density.
4:16
Acute infarctions would not be low density,
4:19
and I'm not seeing any other findings
4:23
that would suggest an acute infarction.
4:26
So, from this point, in most situations, the
4:30
patient would go on to a CT angiogram to identify
4:34
the thrombus, to identify the anatomy that
4:37
would be necessary for the interventionalist to
4:42
have available in navigating to that thrombus,
4:46
and, as well, to look for any other additional
4:49
findings, including occlusions in other
4:52
blood vessels or the incidental aneurysm
4:55
that may need to be treated along the way.
© 2025 Medality. All Rights Reserved.