Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 4, Case 4 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

This is a 70-year-old with a PSA of 7, and as we

0:05

look at the pictures, they're not very pretty.

0:08

There's a lot of air in the rectum, which causes

0:10

a lot of motion on the post-contrast series.

0:13

There's a lot of warping of the prostate due

0:16

to susceptibility artifact from that air.

0:18

I mean, the shape of the prostate on the ADC map

0:21

in the high B-value image does not look like the

0:24

shape of the prostate on the T2-weighted images.

0:27

In addition, these images are very noisy,

0:30

very grainy, and the quality is low.

0:32

The T2 images aren't terrible,

0:34

but they are a little bit blurry.

0:36

Um, and that's probably due to a little

0:37

bit of motion because of the air.

0:39

So, we'll read the case the best we can.

0:43

We'll start, um, at the base, sorry, at the

0:45

apex of the gland on the T2-weighted images.

0:48

And there is a focal area of low T2 signal.

0:51

You can almost pluck it off.

0:53

Um, that's the PI-RADS 4 appearance.

0:55

There is corresponding diffusion

0:57

restriction, which is dark on the ADC map.

1:00

The ADC value is well less than, um, 1,000 on this case.

1:04

And it's bright on the interpolated

1:06

high B-value, uh, measures less than 1.

1:08

5 centimeters.

1:10

There's no extracapsular extent.

1:11

Can't really tell if it's enhancing or not.

1:14

So this is going to be a PI-RADS 4 finding.

1:17

And this was biopsied and there was Gleason

1:20

5 plus 4 disease in it, so that's good.

1:23

We'll continue our way, um, up the gland.

1:26

And still have a kind of heterogeneous

1:28

appearance here on the right.

1:29

The left side looks fine.

1:31

And as we get more towards the base, there's another

1:33

low T2 signal nodule in the peripheral zone that

1:37

looks like you could pluck it right off the page.

1:39

Um, I think it measures about 1.5 centimeters, that's a PI-RADS 5 appearance.

1:44

And then there is some correlative diffusion

1:47

restriction on the ADC map with ADC values less than a thousand.

1:50

And there's no correlation on the high B value.

1:53

So this wasn't reported when the scan was initially

1:56

read, now probably, I don't know, 10 years ago.

1:59

And it also wasn't even included in the write-up when

2:01

I made this fellowship a couple of years ago, so it's

2:04

kind of missed twice, which is a bit concerning to me.

2:07

Um, so, going by strict PI-RADS, alright,

2:12

it's focal low signal on the ADC map,

2:15

no correlate on the high B-value image.

2:18

That gives it a PI-RADS score of 3.

2:20

If you think it's enhancing, which maybe

2:22

it is, that bumps it up to a score of 4.

2:25

Right?

2:25

And because of its size, though, it's gonna be PI-RADS 5.

2:32

I never quite know how to explain when something

2:34

looks like an absolute black hole on the ADC map,

2:37

and you don't see it at all on the high B-value.

2:39

Because the high B-value images are made by

2:42

taking the ADC value and then interpolating.

2:45

Uh, uh, what the signal would be if the B-value were higher.

2:48

So like these two images are, are kind of the same thing.

2:53

The fact that this is a really poor quality study makes me

2:56

a little more likely to say there's some type of artifact

2:58

going on, but I don't have a good explanation for it.

3:01

Um, if I were reading this study today, I would have called

3:04

this a PI-RADS 5 lesion and it would have been biopsied.

3:06

If you go a little more cephalad, we see that there's

3:10

also some low signal in these regions, and on the right,

3:13

it almost blends in with the second lesion, but not quite.

3:17

There's also low ADC signal associated with these areas, and

3:21

there's no high signal in those regions on the high B-value.

3:24

I think that this tissue here, and this tissue here, if

3:28

you, if you scroll and trace where they go,

3:31

they all come back to the base of the seminal vesicles.

3:34

This is normal central zone tissue, which can be

3:37

low signal on T2 and have diffusion restriction, and

3:40

it's adjacent to this abnormal region right here.

Report

Case Discussion

Case Report

Faculty

Daniel Cornfeld, MD

Chief Radiologist

Mātai

Stephen Currin, MD

Radiologist

IMED

Evan Allgood, MD

Abdominal Radiologist

Beverly Radiology Medical Group

Tags

Prostate/seminal vesicles

MRI

Genitourinary (GU)

© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.

Contact UsTerms of UsePrivacy Policy