Interactive Transcript
0:01
So, what are the major advantages
0:02
of radial artery access?
0:03
Post procedure, patients are able to
0:05
immediately ambulate, whereas the common
0:07
femoral access requires patients to lie flat
0:09
for hours, about four to six hours, typically.
0:12
And this is potential for sort
0:13
of earlier discharge, right?
0:14
You get, maybe put on a little band, sort
0:16
of compress or apply pressure, you know,
0:19
for 15 minutes, and then get even a stasis.
0:22
You don't need to suffer the
0:24
expense of a closure device.
0:26
The access site complications are much
0:28
lower, typically, at the site itself,
0:31
and there's an improved sense of privacy.
0:32
It's not sort of a catheter or sheath or
0:34
pressure in your groin, which some may feel
0:37
is a little bit more invasive than a hole
0:39
in pressure or compression on the wrist.
0:42
So, what are three major disadvantages
0:44
of radial artery access?
0:46
Stroke, you know, crossing the common
0:49
carotid, the vertebral arteries, has
0:52
some sort of measurable risk of stroke.
0:54
That is really not the case with
0:56
common femoral artery access.
0:57
Unless you enter, you know, the arch and
1:01
you're performing an arch procedure, the
1:02
postoperative compartment syndrome could result.
1:06
Hand ischemia is also something that can result.
1:08
And here we see an example of an arterial
1:10
dissection and thrombosis of the radial artery in
1:13
a patient who previously had radial artery access in
1:16
the setting of coronary artery catheterization.
1:19
So, we decide to proceed with
1:20
this radial artery access.
1:21
And so what we do, we measure the caliber
1:23
of the radial artery with ultrasound.
1:25
We look at the vessel, make sure that,
1:27
you know, it's 3 millimeters or more.
1:29
Okay, because less than that would be contraindicated.
1:31
Make sure that the selling end technique is
1:33
alive and well and ready to rock and roll.
1:35
And so, you know, a short 21-gauge needle, echogenic tip.
1:37
(Repeated time code; should be removed.)
1:39
We got our little mandrel, 0.018 inch wire.
1:41
(Repeated time code; should be removed.)
1:42
It's ready to rock.
1:43
Then we have our sheath, our nice tapered sheath
1:46
that we would like to place and we want it to be
1:48
nice and maneuverable and soft, but supportive,
1:52
you know, for our radial artery access.
1:54
So, at the end of the day, we want to have a nice
1:56
hydrophilic sheath, and that will help reduce and
1:59
decrease sort of nice, normal access-related pain.
2:04
The presence of this hydrophilic sheath sort of
2:06
reduces spasm as well, and any risk for radial
2:10
artery occlusion that could possibly result.
2:12
Sometimes individuals may consider, you
2:14
know, using some nitroglycerin that can actually
2:17
maximally dilate the artery and minimize pain
2:19
as well, associated with radial artery access.
2:23
So, what we decide to do here is once
2:25
we proceed with radial artery access, we're
2:27
thinking, alright, so we get access.
2:30
What do we want to do?
2:30
How do we want to mitigate any issues?
2:33
We want to give a little antithrombotic,
2:35
we want to give an antispasmodic, and we
2:37
want to deliver all that via the sheath.
2:39
So, what some people may do is they may give some
2:42
heparin, they may give some verapamil, some
2:46
nitroglycerin. Those are sort of the cocktails
2:49
that are typically administered.
2:52
Pulse oximetry remains on the thumb to
2:55
monitor hand perfusion during the procedure.
2:57
So, out of sight is not out of mind.
2:59
We want to make sure that even though
3:00
the patient passed the Barbeau test, we
3:02
want to keep that in mind as a potential
3:05
confounding issue during our procedure.
3:07
We also want to note that the radial artery
3:09
is smaller than the common femoral artery, and
3:10
so we want to note that the limits to sheath
3:13
size are essentially less than 7 centimeters.
3:17
So, what are some complications
3:18
of radial artery access?
3:19
We talked about stroke.
3:21
We mentioned it, and it's not really seen typically
3:24
with common femoral artery access, but some would
3:25
say it can happen, and I would say okay, agreed.
3:30
The other point would be with radial artery
3:31
access, we're going to think about hand ischemia,
3:33
and again, the beauty of the Barbeau test is
3:35
that's going to really reduce the population
3:37
of individuals that are going to be more
3:39
likely to suffer from hand ischemia in the
3:41
absence of that collateral circulation between
3:44
the radial artery and the ulnar artery.
3:47
We want to think about pseudoaneurysms,
3:48
contained ruptures, we want to think about
3:49
hematomas, we want to think about hemorrhage,
3:51
think about vessel spasm and pain, you know,
3:54
and of course, radial artery occlusion,
3:56
which we've talked about mitigating.
3:58
And of course, compartment syndrome is
3:59
something that is just not a good look,
4:01
and so we want to be mindful of that.
4:04
So, there is a 2016 meta-analysis of 24
4:07
trials that studied about 22,000 individuals
4:11
that included the four large contemporary
4:13
trials of acute coronary syndrome patients.
4:16
And what they noted was the following: when you
4:18
look at femoral artery
4:20
access, radial artery access was actually
4:22
associated with a significantly lower
4:24
risk of major bleeding, all-cause
4:27
mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular,
4:30
as well as major vascular complications.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.