Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 1, Case 1 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

So for this case, this was kind of

0:02

a so-called extensive disease case,

0:05

right? Looking at this MIP right away.

0:08

And remember, at least our institution,

0:10

we do the MIPs off the subtracted series.

0:13

Um, and right away you can see

0:15

this mass in the right breast.

0:16

Um, you know, pretty large, right?

0:19

Pretty easy to see and really

0:21

not looking at much else.

0:22

And the others are not seeing much else.

0:24

The other thing that it's really nice

0:25

to see on the MIP is, of course, the

0:26

background parenchymal enhancement.

0:27

And you get a sense of how much there

0:29

is and distribution of it in here.

0:32

You know, we're not seeing

0:33

very much at all, right?

0:34

A few little dots of enhancement.

0:35

Um, maybe not even really much that

0:37

we see here in the right breast.

0:40

So if we pull down our T1 fat

0:43

sat post-contrast, um, we can

0:45

see our corresponding mass here.

0:48

This is a really nice example of rim

0:50

enhancement, and you can see the sort of central

0:54

area that's not enhancing as much or maybe

0:58

not enhancing at all—secondary necrosis.

1:00

Um, the rim part of it is sort

1:03

of very nodular looking, right?

1:05

It's not a very smooth sort of rim enhancement.

1:08

Um, and then at the very bottom,

1:13

part of it, we see this focal susceptibility.

1:15

Susceptibility artifact, and

1:17

that's compatible with our bias to

1:18

clip and always abide by eclipse.

1:20

I always think it's important to mention

1:23

where the clip is in relation to the

1:25

primary finding you're seeing, right?

1:27

So in this case, I would say this is at the

1:29

inferior margin of the mass, and that's really

1:31

helpful for localization purposes, right?

1:32

Like, ideally, you might want to see the clip

1:35

essentially located, and you could say that

1:37

for other cases, but for this one, I would say

1:39

that it's at the inferior margin,

1:41

just so you know, for localization purposes

1:43

later, if you're going to be doing that.

1:46

Of course, in all these cases, where they

1:48

are cancers, which is our primary focus.

1:50

Of course, we always like

1:52

to look up in the excella.

1:53

And in this case here, I think the axillary nodes

1:57

all look very normal.

2:00

And, there were no

2:01

findings on the left breast.

2:02

So, you know, this is sort of your

2:03

classic straightforward cancer, right?

2:06

MRI done for extended disease, but we see just

2:09

the main cancer, and nothing else.

2:13

Um, and we can tell our surgeons that

2:15

this is your classic pyro at six, no

2:17

lymphadenopathy, uh, go on your merry way and

2:19

just plan for localization at a later point.

2:22

As I'm pulling this up again,

2:23

are there any questions?

2:26

I'm going to ask a question if that's

2:28

okay, while you're pulling it up.

2:29

Yes, please.

2:30

I'm pretty new to breast MRI, breast MRI.

2:33

So, um, I apologize for probably some pretty

2:36

basic questions.

2:37

No problem.

2:39

So you were mentioning on the left

2:41

breast, there were some very small

2:43

foci of enhancement on the other side.

2:46

And when I was going through that case, I went

2:48

through and I thought, "Oh, could those just

2:51

be little tiny enhancing nodules?"

2:55

Yep.

2:55

So what makes those nodules not worrisome?

3:00

And not worrisome.

3:03

Time and experience.

3:06

Yes.

3:06

I am chuckling because this is, I feel like

3:08

the age-old question in breast MRI is, is

3:12

that background enhancement or is that a mass?

3:16

And, uh, over time, I would say you

3:19

will develop a better sense of that.

3:22

Um, so.

3:23

But to try and answer your question, of course,

3:26

take a little bit to pull up again, but, um, so

3:29

looking at that MIP is really important, right?

3:31

So if you see, um, several areas of

3:37

small foci, and of course, foci is a

3:41

focus is disappearing from the lexicon,

3:42

I think in the next edition.

3:44

Um, but if you see, uh, several small foci,

3:48

if I can, um, zoom this up just a little

3:51

bit so we can look at that left side.

3:54

Um, you know, like this thing, this

3:57

thing, maybe something in here.

4:00

Um, and if you see that distributed,

4:02

let's say even in both breasts, you would

4:04

say, okay, that is classic background

4:07

parenchymal enhancement, right?

4:08

Um, it's all over the place.

4:11

Uh, none of them, no one in

4:13

particular stands out from the rest.

4:15

Um, the distribution is diffuse.

4:19

Um, you know, I think you should be confident

4:22

to say that's just background enhancement.

4:24

Now the hard part comes when there are

4:28

a few of them as in this case, right?

4:30

And maybe we only have them on one

4:32

side and see if I can pull up the

4:34

regular post and scroll through there.

4:37

Um, you know, so you know, for example,

4:40

is this thing a little focus there

4:42

that we need to do something about?

4:44

Maybe, maybe not.

4:47

You know, I don't see many others.

4:51

Find one real quick here.

4:52

Maybe, maybe one like right here.

4:54

Can you see my cursor, by the way?

4:56

There it is.

4:56

Yep.

4:57

Okay, good.

4:57

So, um, you know, a couple little tiny dots.

5:03

And I guess that is the

5:06

sort of the thing that I do.

5:07

Um, but really it's over time.

5:09

You just got to get a sense of what

5:10

you think is something that is real.

5:11

So in terms of me thinking

5:13

about, is it real or not?

5:15

I think, does it stand out from the rest, right?

5:17

Is this one thing I'm looking at

5:19

bigger than the others, or is the

5:22

enhancement different in some way?

5:23

You could look at CAD maybe if you wanted to

5:25

help you, like, does that one have washout and

5:28

all the rest don't? Something like that.

5:32

Um, uh, you know, And then, um, the other thing

5:38

that I start to think about is that if you

5:39

pick out the one that you're most interested

5:41

in and you start looking around either in that

5:44

same breast or the other breast and you say,

5:46

Oh wait, there's actually, there's another one.

5:48

No, there's another one.

5:48

There's another one.

5:49

Like if you start to get up to two or three

5:51

additional things that you're thinking

5:53

about, I would start to more heavily

5:55

consider maybe this is just background.

5:57

You know, maybe this is not something

5:59

that I need to work on.

6:01

Okay.

6:02

Um, the other thing, the other one to remember,

6:05

just in general, is that, that, um, that

6:07

inflow, or so-called cortical enhancement,

6:10

that we sometimes see at the margin of the,

6:12

um, fibroglandular tissue, that can sometimes

6:15

fool us as being, sometimes people think

6:17

of that as almost like segmental non-mass

6:19

enhancement, but I always try to think about.

6:21

Okay, remember that the contrast is going

6:23

to be taken up from the outer part of the

6:25

breast first, and we sort of get that cortical

6:28

enhancement pattern that sometimes that

6:30

can throw you off, too, but it's difficult.

6:33

It's the bottom line.

6:35

Good question, though.

6:40

Any other questions on that

6:41

case from anybody else?

6:42

Other people?

6:45

Okay.

6:45

I have one more question and then

6:47

I think I'll be good after that.

6:50

Okay.

6:50

Yeah.

6:50

The other question that I just wanted

6:51

to ask was, um, and I think this would

6:53

be super easy in this case for you to

6:55

show Mm-Hmm, when I was trying to, um,

6:57

measure the distance to the nipple.

7:00

Uh, yes.

7:00

Do you, do you take it off of the,

7:03

um, axial or the sagittal ? Yes.

7:06

Um, you're asking some great questions.

7:10

I'm just gonna move this outta the way.

7:13

Let's see here so I can see everything.

7:14

All right.

7:15

So I'm gonna, I'm gonna pull up a couple things

7:17

just to get, um, so we can talk about that.

7:20

And I think, um, Anu had the same question.

7:25

Yes.

7:26

Okay, so, um, this is a great question.

7:32

And, um, the, the bottom line is

7:34

that there's Also not a great answer.

7:38

So, and it depends on sort of who you are.

7:41

Um, but I will tell you my philosophy

7:45

and you can adopt it or not.

7:48

So, um, the first part of

7:50

the philosophy is that.

7:52

You're trying to describe where in, in

7:56

the breast you believe this mass is right.

7:59

And we typically use clock face position

8:02

and distance from the nipple, right?

8:03

So clock face, I think we

8:05

can all figure out, right.

6:50

Yeah.

6:50

The other question that I just wanted

6:51

to ask was, um, and I think this would

6:53

be super easy in this case for you to

6:55

show. Mm-Hmm, when I was trying to, um,

6:57

measure the distance to the nipple.

7:00

Uh, yes.

7:00

Do you, do you take it off of the,

7:03

um, axial or the sagittal? Yes.

7:06

Um, you're asking some great questions.

7:10

I'm just gonna move this outta the way.

7:13

Let's see here so I can see everything.

7:14

All right.

7:15

So I'm gonna, I'm gonna pull up a couple things

7:17

just to get, um, so we can talk about that.

7:20

And I think, um, Anu had the same question.

7:25

Yes.

7:26

Okay, so, um, this is a great question.

7:32

And, um, the bottom line is

7:34

that there's also not a great answer.

7:38

So, and it depends on sort of who you are.

7:41

Um, but I will tell you my philosophy

7:45

and you can adopt it or not.

7:48

So, um, the first part of

7:50

the philosophy is that.

7:52

You're trying to describe where in, in

7:56

the breast you believe this mass is, right?

7:59

And we typically use clock face position

8:02

and distance from the nipple, right?

8:03

So clock face, I think we

8:05

can all figure out, right.

8:05

That's pretty straightforward.

8:07

Um, distance from the nipple, of

8:09

course, gets more difficult, right?

8:11

Because it matters how you measure it.

8:13

So what I like to do is that, um, and

8:17

I do this for, uh, mammograms as well,

8:20

when you're going to ultrasound is to

8:21

try to sort of pretend, pretend that you

8:23

are going to be the next person, right?

8:25

So let's say you're going to be the

8:26

sonographer and you're going to say,

8:27

I'm going to try and find this thing.

8:29

And you have to remember the patient's

8:30

going to be laying on their back.

8:32

And so I try to sort of think, okay,

8:34

if I were, the transducer here.

8:37

How would I measure that?

8:38

Um, so in this case, right?

8:41

Um, I think we're first thing I figure

8:44

out are we below the nipple, right?

8:46

Yes.

8:47

It looks like we're below the

8:47

nipple or in the right breast.

8:50

Um, and we're lateral.

8:51

So let's say we're going

8:52

to be about eight o'clock.

8:54

Now the question is how far from the nipple,

8:58

and we know that it's up here, right?

9:01

It's not in the same plane.

9:02

So this is difficult.

9:04

Um, so people take one approach where

9:06

they go down to the nipple, sort of hold

9:09

their cursor there, move up to your spot,

9:11

and then they would measure from where my

9:13

arrow is to the mass, something like that.

9:16

Um, I think that is okay.

9:20

Uh, that is one approach.

9:21

Um, the other way to do it is to think about

9:24

sort of being the transducer or something.

9:28

And, uh, you might measure from where the nipple

9:31

sort of should be here on this image and then

9:33

come out, uh, laterally and measure it that way.

9:35

That's probably what I would do.

9:37

Um, to get a relative sense of it.

9:42

Um, some people I know will just

9:44

measure from, uh, their best guess

9:47

sort of here ish on this one and say,

9:49

okay, I'm going to measure like this.

9:51

Um, it gets a little bit dicey.

9:53

The other thing that I would say in general,

9:56

which is important to do is to try to put it

10:00

all together for your referring providers.

10:02

So if on every other study you said this is,

10:07

let's say eight o'clock and three centimeters

10:09

to the nipple, I wouldn't say, "Oh, this is

10:12

eight o'clock six," or something like that.

10:15

Measuring it some alternative way.

10:17

I think it's just going to lead to confusion.

10:18

All you're, you're all

10:20

talking about the same lesion.

10:22

So, you know, if my measurement is,

10:25

or, or maybe even five measuring my way,

10:29

but we've described it as eight o'clock

10:31

three for the rest, I would probably say

10:34

approximately three or something like that.

10:36

Um, I think you don't want to create any

10:38

more confusion than you have, uh, uh,

10:42

by, by, by, by describing a different

10:45

distance from the nipple, right?

10:46

Cause you will get the question,

10:47

"Oh, is this something separate

10:48

from what we described before?"

Report

HISTORY: 56-year-old woman with a history of recently diagnosed right breast cancer. Evaluation of extent of disease.

Summary of prior imaging:
Mammography: Patient presented after recent abdominal CT demonstrated an enhancing mass in the lateral aspect of the right breast. Diagnostic mammogram demonstrated scattered fibroglandular densities with an irregular obscured mass in the right breast at 8:00 anterior depth.
Ultrasound: Subsequent ultrasound demonstrated a correlating 31 x 30 x 19 mm irregular hypoechoic mass with posterior acoustic shadowing at 8:00 5 cm from the nipple. There was no axillary adenopathy identified.

Breast MRI: NA

FINDINGS
Quality control issues: ☒None ☐Poor/lack contrast bolus ☐Poor fat suppression
☐ Susceptibility ☐Movement ☐Other: Click or tap here to enter text.
Background Parenchymal Enhancement: Minimal
Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue: Scattered fibroglandular tissue

LEFT BREAST
Narrative: Negative. No suspicious enhancement or lymphadenopathy.

Associated findings LEFT breast: ☐Nipple retraction, ☐Nipple involvement, ☐Skin retraction, ☐Skin thickening, ☐Skin invasion-direct, ☐Skin invasion-inflammatory,
☐ Pectoral muscle invasion, ☐Chest wall invasion, ☐ Architectural distortion
Non-enhancing findings LEFT breast: ☐High ductal signal pre contrast T1, ☐Cyst(s),
☐ Hematoma/seroma, ☐Post therapy skin/trabecular thickening, ☐Non-enhancing mass,
☐ Architectural distortion, ☐Signal void from clips
Fat containing lesions LEFT: ☐Fat necrosis, ☐Hamartoma, ☐Post-operative seroma/hematoma with fat

Lymph nodes LEFT: ☒Normal axillary, ☐Abnormal axillary: description, ☐ Abnormal internal mammary: description


RIGHT BREAST
Narrative: At 8:00, 5 cm from the nipple there is a 2.6 cm (AP) irregular mass with irregular margins and rim enhancement. There is focal susceptibility artifact at the inferior margin of the mass compatible with a biopsy clip. There is no suspicious lymphadenopathy.



Associated findings RIGHT breast: ☐Nipple retraction, ☐Nipple involvement, ☐Skin retraction, ☐Skin thickening, ☐Skin invasion-direct, ☐Skin invasion-inflammatory,
☐ Pectoral muscle invasion, ☐Chest wall invasion, ☐ Architectural distortion
Non-enhancing findings RIGHT breast: ☐High ductal signal pre contrast T1, ☐Cyst(s),
☐ Hematoma/seroma, ☐Post therapy skin/trabecular thickening, ☐Non-enhancing mass,
☐ Architectural distortion, ☐Signal void from clips
Fat containing lesions RIGHT: ☐Fat necrosis, ☐Hamartoma, ☐Post-operative seroma/hematoma with fat

Lymph nodes RIGHT: ☒Normal axillary, ☐Abnormal axillary: description, ☐ Abnormal internal mammary: description

Extramammary findings: None
SUMMARY:

1) Known biopsy-proven malignancy at 8:00 anterior depth in the right breast, measuring up to 2.6 cm on MRI.
2) No axillary adenopathy

RECOMMENDATIONS: BI-RADS Category 6. Surgical excision when clinically appropriate (follow up with the surgeon or oncologist).

INTERPRETER: Click or tap here to enter text.

Case Discussion

Faculty

Petra J Lewis, MBBS

Professor of Radiology and OBGYN

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center & Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

Sheryl G. Jordan, MD

Professor, Department of Radiology

University of North Carolina School of Medicine

Ryan W. Woods, MD, MPH

Assistant Professor of Radiology

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Tags

Women's Health

MRI

Breast

© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.

Contact UsTerms of UsePrivacy Policy