Interactive Transcript
0:00
So for this case, this was kind of
0:02
a so-called extensive disease case,
0:05
right? Looking at this MIP right away.
0:08
And remember, at least our institution,
0:10
we do the MIPs off the subtracted series.
0:13
Um, and right away you can see
0:15
this mass in the right breast.
0:16
Um, you know, pretty large, right?
0:19
Pretty easy to see and really
0:21
not looking at much else.
0:22
And the others are not seeing much else.
0:24
The other thing that it's really nice
0:25
to see on the MIP is, of course, the
0:26
background parenchymal enhancement.
0:27
And you get a sense of how much there
0:29
is and distribution of it in here.
0:32
You know, we're not seeing
0:33
very much at all, right?
0:34
A few little dots of enhancement.
0:35
Um, maybe not even really much that
0:37
we see here in the right breast.
0:40
So if we pull down our T1 fat
0:43
sat post-contrast, um, we can
0:45
see our corresponding mass here.
0:48
This is a really nice example of rim
0:50
enhancement, and you can see the sort of central
0:54
area that's not enhancing as much or maybe
0:58
not enhancing at all—secondary necrosis.
1:00
Um, the rim part of it is sort
1:03
of very nodular looking, right?
1:05
It's not a very smooth sort of rim enhancement.
1:08
Um, and then at the very bottom,
1:13
part of it, we see this focal susceptibility.
1:15
Susceptibility artifact, and
1:17
that's compatible with our bias to
1:18
clip and always abide by eclipse.
1:20
I always think it's important to mention
1:23
where the clip is in relation to the
1:25
primary finding you're seeing, right?
1:27
So in this case, I would say this is at the
1:29
inferior margin of the mass, and that's really
1:31
helpful for localization purposes, right?
1:32
Like, ideally, you might want to see the clip
1:35
essentially located, and you could say that
1:37
for other cases, but for this one, I would say
1:39
that it's at the inferior margin,
1:41
just so you know, for localization purposes
1:43
later, if you're going to be doing that.
1:46
Of course, in all these cases, where they
1:48
are cancers, which is our primary focus.
1:50
Of course, we always like
1:52
to look up in the excella.
1:53
And in this case here, I think the axillary nodes
1:57
all look very normal.
2:00
And, there were no
2:01
findings on the left breast.
2:02
So, you know, this is sort of your
2:03
classic straightforward cancer, right?
2:06
MRI done for extended disease, but we see just
2:09
the main cancer, and nothing else.
2:13
Um, and we can tell our surgeons that
2:15
this is your classic pyro at six, no
2:17
lymphadenopathy, uh, go on your merry way and
2:19
just plan for localization at a later point.
2:22
As I'm pulling this up again,
2:23
are there any questions?
2:26
I'm going to ask a question if that's
2:28
okay, while you're pulling it up.
2:29
Yes, please.
2:30
I'm pretty new to breast MRI, breast MRI.
2:33
So, um, I apologize for probably some pretty
2:36
basic questions.
2:37
No problem.
2:39
So you were mentioning on the left
2:41
breast, there were some very small
2:43
foci of enhancement on the other side.
2:46
And when I was going through that case, I went
2:48
through and I thought, "Oh, could those just
2:51
be little tiny enhancing nodules?"
2:55
Yep.
2:55
So what makes those nodules not worrisome?
3:00
And not worrisome.
3:03
Time and experience.
3:06
Yes.
3:06
I am chuckling because this is, I feel like
3:08
the age-old question in breast MRI is, is
3:12
that background enhancement or is that a mass?
3:16
And, uh, over time, I would say you
3:19
will develop a better sense of that.
3:22
Um, so.
3:23
But to try and answer your question, of course,
3:26
take a little bit to pull up again, but, um, so
3:29
looking at that MIP is really important, right?
3:31
So if you see, um, several areas of
3:37
small foci, and of course, foci is a
3:41
focus is disappearing from the lexicon,
3:42
I think in the next edition.
3:44
Um, but if you see, uh, several small foci,
3:48
if I can, um, zoom this up just a little
3:51
bit so we can look at that left side.
3:54
Um, you know, like this thing, this
3:57
thing, maybe something in here.
4:00
Um, and if you see that distributed,
4:02
let's say even in both breasts, you would
4:04
say, okay, that is classic background
4:07
parenchymal enhancement, right?
4:08
Um, it's all over the place.
4:11
Uh, none of them, no one in
4:13
particular stands out from the rest.
4:15
Um, the distribution is diffuse.
4:19
Um, you know, I think you should be confident
4:22
to say that's just background enhancement.
4:24
Now the hard part comes when there are
4:28
a few of them as in this case, right?
4:30
And maybe we only have them on one
4:32
side and see if I can pull up the
4:34
regular post and scroll through there.
4:37
Um, you know, so you know, for example,
4:40
is this thing a little focus there
4:42
that we need to do something about?
4:44
Maybe, maybe not.
4:47
You know, I don't see many others.
4:51
Find one real quick here.
4:52
Maybe, maybe one like right here.
4:54
Can you see my cursor, by the way?
4:56
There it is.
4:56
Yep.
4:57
Okay, good.
4:57
So, um, you know, a couple little tiny dots.
5:03
And I guess that is the
5:06
sort of the thing that I do.
5:07
Um, but really it's over time.
5:09
You just got to get a sense of what
5:10
you think is something that is real.
5:11
So in terms of me thinking
5:13
about, is it real or not?
5:15
I think, does it stand out from the rest, right?
5:17
Is this one thing I'm looking at
5:19
bigger than the others, or is the
5:22
enhancement different in some way?
5:23
You could look at CAD maybe if you wanted to
5:25
help you, like, does that one have washout and
5:28
all the rest don't? Something like that.
5:32
Um, uh, you know, And then, um, the other thing
5:38
that I start to think about is that if you
5:39
pick out the one that you're most interested
5:41
in and you start looking around either in that
5:44
same breast or the other breast and you say,
5:46
Oh wait, there's actually, there's another one.
5:48
No, there's another one.
5:48
There's another one.
5:49
Like if you start to get up to two or three
5:51
additional things that you're thinking
5:53
about, I would start to more heavily
5:55
consider maybe this is just background.
5:57
You know, maybe this is not something
5:59
that I need to work on.
6:01
Okay.
6:02
Um, the other thing, the other one to remember,
6:05
just in general, is that, that, um, that
6:07
inflow, or so-called cortical enhancement,
6:10
that we sometimes see at the margin of the,
6:12
um, fibroglandular tissue, that can sometimes
6:15
fool us as being, sometimes people think
6:17
of that as almost like segmental non-mass
6:19
enhancement, but I always try to think about.
6:21
Okay, remember that the contrast is going
6:23
to be taken up from the outer part of the
6:25
breast first, and we sort of get that cortical
6:28
enhancement pattern that sometimes that
6:30
can throw you off, too, but it's difficult.
6:33
It's the bottom line.
6:35
Good question, though.
6:40
Any other questions on that
6:41
case from anybody else?
6:42
Other people?
6:45
Okay.
6:45
I have one more question and then
6:47
I think I'll be good after that.
6:50
Okay.
6:50
Yeah.
6:50
The other question that I just wanted
6:51
to ask was, um, and I think this would
6:53
be super easy in this case for you to
6:55
show Mm-Hmm, when I was trying to, um,
6:57
measure the distance to the nipple.
7:00
Uh, yes.
7:00
Do you, do you take it off of the,
7:03
um, axial or the sagittal ? Yes.
7:06
Um, you're asking some great questions.
7:10
I'm just gonna move this outta the way.
7:13
Let's see here so I can see everything.
7:14
All right.
7:15
So I'm gonna, I'm gonna pull up a couple things
7:17
just to get, um, so we can talk about that.
7:20
And I think, um, Anu had the same question.
7:25
Yes.
7:26
Okay, so, um, this is a great question.
7:32
And, um, the, the bottom line is
7:34
that there's Also not a great answer.
7:38
So, and it depends on sort of who you are.
7:41
Um, but I will tell you my philosophy
7:45
and you can adopt it or not.
7:48
So, um, the first part of
7:50
the philosophy is that.
7:52
You're trying to describe where in, in
7:56
the breast you believe this mass is right.
7:59
And we typically use clock face position
8:02
and distance from the nipple, right?
8:03
So clock face, I think we
8:05
can all figure out, right.
6:50
Yeah.
6:50
The other question that I just wanted
6:51
to ask was, um, and I think this would
6:53
be super easy in this case for you to
6:55
show. Mm-Hmm, when I was trying to, um,
6:57
measure the distance to the nipple.
7:00
Uh, yes.
7:00
Do you, do you take it off of the,
7:03
um, axial or the sagittal? Yes.
7:06
Um, you're asking some great questions.
7:10
I'm just gonna move this outta the way.
7:13
Let's see here so I can see everything.
7:14
All right.
7:15
So I'm gonna, I'm gonna pull up a couple things
7:17
just to get, um, so we can talk about that.
7:20
And I think, um, Anu had the same question.
7:25
Yes.
7:26
Okay, so, um, this is a great question.
7:32
And, um, the bottom line is
7:34
that there's also not a great answer.
7:38
So, and it depends on sort of who you are.
7:41
Um, but I will tell you my philosophy
7:45
and you can adopt it or not.
7:48
So, um, the first part of
7:50
the philosophy is that.
7:52
You're trying to describe where in, in
7:56
the breast you believe this mass is, right?
7:59
And we typically use clock face position
8:02
and distance from the nipple, right?
8:03
So clock face, I think we
8:05
can all figure out, right.
8:05
That's pretty straightforward.
8:07
Um, distance from the nipple, of
8:09
course, gets more difficult, right?
8:11
Because it matters how you measure it.
8:13
So what I like to do is that, um, and
8:17
I do this for, uh, mammograms as well,
8:20
when you're going to ultrasound is to
8:21
try to sort of pretend, pretend that you
8:23
are going to be the next person, right?
8:25
So let's say you're going to be the
8:26
sonographer and you're going to say,
8:27
I'm going to try and find this thing.
8:29
And you have to remember the patient's
8:30
going to be laying on their back.
8:32
And so I try to sort of think, okay,
8:34
if I were, the transducer here.
8:37
How would I measure that?
8:38
Um, so in this case, right?
8:41
Um, I think we're first thing I figure
8:44
out are we below the nipple, right?
8:46
Yes.
8:47
It looks like we're below the
8:47
nipple or in the right breast.
8:50
Um, and we're lateral.
8:51
So let's say we're going
8:52
to be about eight o'clock.
8:54
Now the question is how far from the nipple,
8:58
and we know that it's up here, right?
9:01
It's not in the same plane.
9:02
So this is difficult.
9:04
Um, so people take one approach where
9:06
they go down to the nipple, sort of hold
9:09
their cursor there, move up to your spot,
9:11
and then they would measure from where my
9:13
arrow is to the mass, something like that.
9:16
Um, I think that is okay.
9:20
Uh, that is one approach.
9:21
Um, the other way to do it is to think about
9:24
sort of being the transducer or something.
9:28
And, uh, you might measure from where the nipple
9:31
sort of should be here on this image and then
9:33
come out, uh, laterally and measure it that way.
9:35
That's probably what I would do.
9:37
Um, to get a relative sense of it.
9:42
Um, some people I know will just
9:44
measure from, uh, their best guess
9:47
sort of here ish on this one and say,
9:49
okay, I'm going to measure like this.
9:51
Um, it gets a little bit dicey.
9:53
The other thing that I would say in general,
9:56
which is important to do is to try to put it
10:00
all together for your referring providers.
10:02
So if on every other study you said this is,
10:07
let's say eight o'clock and three centimeters
10:09
to the nipple, I wouldn't say, "Oh, this is
10:12
eight o'clock six," or something like that.
10:15
Measuring it some alternative way.
10:17
I think it's just going to lead to confusion.
10:18
All you're, you're all
10:20
talking about the same lesion.
10:22
So, you know, if my measurement is,
10:25
or, or maybe even five measuring my way,
10:29
but we've described it as eight o'clock
10:31
three for the rest, I would probably say
10:34
approximately three or something like that.
10:36
Um, I think you don't want to create any
10:38
more confusion than you have, uh, uh,
10:42
by, by, by, by describing a different
10:45
distance from the nipple, right?
10:46
Cause you will get the question,
10:47
"Oh, is this something separate
10:48
from what we described before?"
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.