Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 5, Case 2 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

So this is a 40-year-old who presented

0:05

with palpable mass in her right

0:07

breast, 6 o'clock posterior depth.

0:11

It was really tucked in there.

0:13

And so we're going to start up high.

0:15

Actually, let's start down low in her

0:17

because you can see the mass more readily.

0:19

Unlike the last patient who had stage zero

0:22

disease DCIS and non-mass enhancement.

0:25

This is, remember these, this is the

0:27

source data here, but, and this is the

0:30

biopsy track. This got a lot of people

0:31

this just tripped up a lot of people.

0:34

But this is T2 bright.

0:35

So this is actually the biopsy tract here.

0:37

Just FYI.

0:38

Okay, so in the right breast coming up, and you

0:41

can see it just leads right into the index mass.

0:43

Um, we have our index mass, which is

0:46

an irregular. When you actually zoom it

0:48

as we did for the gold standard report,

0:51

you can tell that the edges are serrated.

0:53

So this is, and rather,

0:56

rather than being considered

0:57

round, oval, or circumscribed, we

0:59

would call this an irregular mass.

1:00

This is heterogeneous in enhancement.

1:03

It's not homogeneous like a light bulb.

1:06

It clearly does enhance, though

1:08

it sits posteriorly, but it does

1:11

not impact the pectoral muscle.

1:13

So I wanna make sure we make that point, that

1:16

pectoral muscle, uh, although there's a vessel

1:19

in it there, and that's just because this is

1:21

a, there's neovascular and this is, uh, this.

1:24

Um, cancer is begging and is commanding, um,

1:28

enhancement, um, because of its neovascularity.

1:32

There is no abutment or invasion

1:35

of the pectoral muscles.

1:36

I want to make sure that you see that.

1:38

But as we come up, in addition

1:40

to seeing the, seeing the mass,

1:43

we've already begun to notice that.

1:46

There is a symmetry of the local

1:50

regional lymph node 1 bearing site,

1:53

which is the internal mammary site.

1:55

So I just want to direct your attention.

1:58

Many of you were successful in

2:02

seeing 1 internal mammary lymph node.

2:05

Uh, but didn't mention the fact

2:07

that there are at least two of them.

2:08

So this is at least, uh, at least one other.

2:11

And these are large internal, this is a

2:13

large lymph node, not so much this one.

2:15

The other one's huge though.

2:16

So I'm going to just keep scrolling up.

2:19

And you're going to see a very large,

2:22

um, enhancing lymph node on the right.

2:25

The interesting thing here, I think,

2:26

is how much like the index mass.

2:29

And I have noticed that anecdotally after

2:31

a while, as the mammary lymph nodes get

2:33

larger, they just start to look and many

2:36

actually lymph nodes. They really do look

2:38

like the, they look like the index of

2:40

breast mass and I would, I would submit

2:42

to you that this is very similar to that.

2:45

Um, At the other, uh, let's pause

2:49

for just a moment and talk about

2:50

local regional lymphadenopathy.

2:51

Remember, we're always, we know about the

2:53

axillary lymph nodes one, two, and three.

2:56

We've discussed them before, um, with one

2:59

being lateral and inferior to the PEC minor.

3:03

This is the PEC minor.

3:05

This is the PEC major.

3:06

I'm gonna go, I'm gonna scroll down a

3:07

little bit here so that you can see it.

3:09

There we go.

3:10

And as we're just coming down,

3:12

there's the minor again and the major.

3:14

So we're looking out here and under this for

3:20

level 1, and there are, of course, the most

3:22

common limits, and they are typically the

3:23

lymph nodes that are the draining lymph nodes.

3:25

They're the so-called sentinel lymph nodes.

3:27

So those are the ones that will be involved.

3:29

It is unusual.

3:30

To go exclusively to the internal mammary nodes,

3:33

but that's exactly what this patient did.

3:35

And then the level 2 axillary lymph

3:37

nodes are the ones that are, um, that are

3:41

posterior to the, um, so they would be

3:43

back here, posterior to the minor muscle.

3:47

Um, the, um, Rotter's nodes are between

3:51

the PEC major and the PEC minor.

3:53

So they would be sitting in here if.

3:55

She had any, which I'm glad she doesn't.

3:58

They count as level two lymph

4:00

nodes as well, believe it or not.

4:01

And then, um, subpectoral lymph nodes, the ones

4:05

that are the ones that, um, a lot of surgeons

4:08

and medical oncologists call them subpectoral.

4:12

We still just call them level two lymph

4:13

nodes, but those, the so-called subpectoral

4:16

lymph nodes are largely level two lymph

4:19

nodes, and then level three lymph nodes are

4:21

tough for us or can be tough for us on MR.

4:23

Those are the ones that are.

4:24

Um, either medial to the PEC, so they'd

4:27

be sitting over here PEC minor or superior

4:30

to the, um, to the, um, PEC minor.

4:33

So, they're above it, and very frequently,

4:34

they're just not included because

4:36

they're in the superior mediastinum.

4:37

Sometimes they are, but you would more

4:39

frequently see them on PET or some sort of

4:42

axial imaging that goes through the neck.

4:45

All right, so we've talked about

4:46

local regional lymph nodes, and

4:49

all of them are in our must-check.

4:54

Uh, purview.

4:55

These are our responsibilities,

4:57

so we wanna get these right.

4:58

And that's the reason that we focused on

5:00

them as much as we did in week five.

5:02

So we've reviewed axillary one, two,

5:04

and three, or level one, two, and three.

5:07

We've reviewed all the weird ones like Rotter's

5:10

and subpectoral or the alternate type names.

5:12

They're all, they're all,

5:14

uh, level two lymph nodes.

5:15

Um, and then the point of this case

5:18

is, um, internal mammary lymph nodes.

5:20

I do wanna just.

5:22

Uh, let you know, I want to direct your

5:23

attention to the gift that we have

5:26

been given, which is the gift of the other

5:28

half of these patients' bodies.

5:31

So just remember to look to the other side.

5:34

So that really helps these internal

5:37

mammary lymph nodes stand out.

5:39

This is a really nice example.

5:41

So these are the internal mammary

5:43

vessels all sort of lined up in a row.

5:46

Um, there's a vein, there's an artery.

5:48

There are even some lymphatics.

5:49

There are certainly some branches, but there

5:51

should not be an additional mass.

5:55

Be careful not to overcall a vessel that is

5:57

branching from a normal vessel, which is branching

6:00

and going anterior just to get to the breast.

6:04

But again, there's typically a hint that there's

6:07

something different and wrong about these.

6:11

I also want to, we have a lot of.

6:13

Several of you actually, probably the majority

6:15

of you, um, were concerned about these lymph

6:19

nodes in part, I think, because we may have, um,

6:22

uh, given you a red herring by actually having,

6:25

uh, indicated indicating to you that somebody

6:28

had a clip, uh, or indicating to you that she'd

6:30

been biopsied because there's susceptibility

6:32

artifact. But I want you to also use the

6:35

technique that it was a benign lymph node, by the

6:37

way, but I also want you to use the technique

6:39

of comparison one side to the other.

6:42

So it's unlikely that we're going

6:44

to have patients who have symmetric

6:46

bilateral axillary metastases in the

6:49

setting of the usual breast cancer.

6:52

And so, when you see prominent lymph nodes on one

6:54

side, if they're not really much different than

6:57

the other side, and I would submit to you that

6:59

there are a lot of prominent "quote, prominent

7:01

lymph nodes in the left breast as well, have

7:04

a higher threshold to call them abnormal.

7:07

Okay, so, uh, spot her some, um, uh, spot her

7:12

some, um, uh, some enlargement of the lymph

7:16

nodes as non-pathologic if they're bilateral.

7:20

All right, so that's case, uh, case.

7:23

That's our, well, that's

7:25

already our third case, man.

7:26

Uh, okay.

7:27

Good.

7:27

Good.

7:28

Everybody.

7:28

Let me check the chat.

7:29

I see that there's a question in there.

7:31

Let me just check it real fast.

7:32

And we're not sure with enemy versus

7:36

fibrocystic disease, is it better to over

7:38

call your experience so that it gets biopsy?

7:40

I think, Dr.

7:42

John, and I've really enjoyed

7:45

doing your reports. By the way, I

7:46

did more of them last night.

7:48

As a matter of fact, I think

7:50

you're a terrific radiologist.

7:51

Actually, I think all of you are.

7:52

Let me check to see who

7:53

the participants are today.

7:54

But I think that's a really good question.

7:56

Rely very heavily on the symmetry

8:01

bilaterally and rely heavily

8:05

on any priors that you may have.

8:08

Also, the intrinsic breast density

8:12

and the intrinsic risk, which is really

8:14

frustrating for me to tell you all of that.

Report

HISTORY: 40 year old woman presented with palpable right breast mass.

Summary of prior imaging:

Mammography: Obscured 3.0 cm mass right breast 6:00 posterior depth
Ultrasound: None
Breast MRI: None

FINDINGS

Quality control issues: ☒None ☐Poor/lack contrast bolus ☐Poor fat suppression
☐Susceptibility ☐Movement ☐Other

Background Parenchymal Enhancement: Moderate
Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue: Extreme fibroglandular tissue

LEFT BREAST

Narrative
There is a 1.3 cm benign-appearing enhancing mass in the 11:00 middle depth. There are no suspicious enhancing masses. No axillary or internal mammary lymphadenopathy is seen. There is no abnormal skin, nipple, or pectoralis muscle enhancement.

Left breast lesion 1
Lesion type: Mass
1.3 cm. Upper inner Quadrant. 11:00 Radian. 6.0 cm from the nipple

Mass/post-surgical change: Shape:Oval/lobulated. Margins:Circumscribed. Enhancement: Homogenous. Kinetics: delayed-Progressive

Associated findings LEFT: ☒NONE, ☐Nipple retraction, ☐Nipple involvement, ☐Skin retraction, ☐Skin thickening, ☐Skin invasion-direct, ☐Skin invasion-inflammatory, ☐Pectoral muscle invasion, ☐Chest wall invasion, ☐ Architectural distortion

Non-enhancing findings LEFT: ☐NONE, ☐High ductal signal pre contrast T1, ☒Cyst(s), ☐Hematoma/seroma, ☐Post therapy skin/trabecular thickening, ☐Non-enhancing mass, ☐Architectural distortion, ☐Signal void from clips

Fat containing lesions LEFT: ☒NONE, ☐Fat necrosis, ☐Hamartoma, ☐Post-operative seroma/hematoma with fat

Lymph nodes LEFT: ☒Normal axillary, ☐Abnormal axillary, ☐ Abnormal internal mammary

RIGHT BREAST

Narrative
There is a 3.0 cm irregular heterogeneously enhancing mass 6:00 posterior depth containing a biopsy marker clip with susceptibility artifact. There is right internal mammary lymphadenopathy, the largest of which measures 2.9 cm. There are T2 bright oval masses in the middle depth consistent with simple cysts, the largest of which measures 1.5 cm. There is a 0.8 cm T2 bright, fat-containing mass in the right breast 7:00 middle depth likely fat necrosis.
There are no suspicious areas of non-mass enhancement. No axillary lymphadenopathy is seen. There is no abnormal skin, nipple, or pectoralis muscle enhancement.

Right breast lesion 1
Lesion type: Mass
3.0 cm. 6:00 Radian. 8.3 cm from the nipple

Mass/post-surgical change: Shape:Irregular. Margins:Not circumscribed-spiculated.
Enhancement: Heterogenous. Kinetics: delayed-Washout

Associated findings RIGHT: ☒NONE, ☐Nipple retraction, ☐Nipple involvement, ☐Skin retraction, ☐Skin thickening, ☐Skin invasion-direct, ☐Skin invasion-inflammatory, ☐Pectoral muscle invasion, ☐Chest wall invasion, ☐ Architectural distortion

Non-enhancing findings RIGHT: ☐NONE, ☐High ductal signal pre contrast T1, ☒Cyst(s), ☐Hematoma/seroma, ☐Post therapy skin/trabecular thickening, ☐Non-enhancing mass, ☐Architectural distortion, ☒Signal void from clips

Fat containing lesions RIGHT: ☒NONE, ☐Fat necrosis, ☐Hamartoma, ☐Post-operative seroma/hematoma with fat

Lymph nodes RIGHT: ☐Normal axillary, ☐Abnormal axillary: description, ☒ Abnormal internal mammary: IMLN present, the largest of which measures 2.9 cm

Extramammary findings: None

SUMMARY: Biopsy-proven right breast cancer with ipsilateral internal mammary adenopathy

LEFT BI-RADS: 2: Benign: Routine breast MRI screening if cumulative lifetime risk =>20%
RIGHT BI-RADS: 6: Known biopsy-proven malignancy: Surgical excision when clinically appropriate

RECOMMENDATIONS: Referral for multidisciplinary evaluation and care, in this case neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Case Discussion

Faculty

Petra J Lewis, MBBS

Professor of Radiology and OBGYN

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center & Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

Sheryl G. Jordan, MD

Professor, Department of Radiology

University of North Carolina School of Medicine

Ryan W. Woods, MD, MPH

Assistant Professor of Radiology

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Tags

Women's Health

MRI

Breast

© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.

Contact UsTerms of UsePrivacy Policy