Sinonasal Carcinomas: MR and CT Imaging Features
HIDEInteractive Transcript
0:01
Hello everyone.
0:02
Dr. Sidney Levy here.
0:04
I'd like to continue our discussion of the
0:07
diagnosis and staging of Sinonasal Squamous
0:10
Cell Carcinoma by discussing general imaging
0:14
features of this sample case which I've selected.
0:18
So, on the left I have a pre-contrast T1
0:20
weighted axial sequence without fat suppression.
0:24
In the center I have a T2 coronal with fat suppression.
0:28
And on the right, I have a post-
0:30
contrast T1 with fat suppression.
0:33
So, sinonasal tumors may be either well or poorly
0:36
defined masses with irregular or speculated margins.
0:40
In this case, it is a relatively well-defined
0:42
mass with a rather lobulated morphology.
0:46
This particular tumor is originating in
0:48
the nasal cavity, the right nasal cavity.
0:51
There is secondary obstruction of the right maxillary
0:56
sinus, and the T2-weighted images are very important
1:00
for distinguishing tumor from secondary obstruction.
1:05
So firstly, on the T1-weighted imaging, the
1:09
tumor is of similar signal intensity to muscle.
1:13
So, hypointense to intermediate intensity.
1:17
It is slightly hyperintense in
1:19
relation to musculature in this case.
1:24
On T2-weighted imaging, it's important to note that
1:27
often these tumors are not particularly hyperintense.
1:30
They're often of intermediate signal intensity.
1:33
And it's worth comparing them with musculature.
1:36
In this case, it is of intermediate
1:39
signal intensity and it is hyperintense
1:43
with respect to orbital musculature.
1:46
Some people have reported that Sinonasal squamous
1:49
cell carcinoma is relatively hypointense on
1:53
T2 weighted imaging compared with other sinonasal
1:55
malignancies due to its increased cellularity
1:59
and Nucleocytoplasmic ratio.
2:02
T2-weighted imaging is very important for
2:05
distinguishing secondary obstruction of, in this
2:08
case, the maxillary sinus with primary tumor in the
2:12
right nasal cavity, which is relatively hypointense.
2:18
If restricted diffusion has been assessed, then these
2:21
tumors tend to demonstrate mildly restricted diffusion.
2:25
On post-contrast imaging, there is mild to
2:28
moderate diffuse heterogeneous enhancement.
2:32
In cases where the tumor is encroaching on
2:35
the retropharyngeal space, preservation of
2:37
retropharyngeal fat excludes tumor infiltration,
2:41
whereas loss of retropharyngeal fat is an equivocal
2:45
finding which may or may not reflect infiltration.
2:50
With regards to nodal spread, sinonasal malignancy
2:53
tends to involve lymph nodes in levels 2, 4, and 6.
2:59
Sometimes there can also be superior
3:02
spread to retropharyngeal lymph nodes.
3:04
So it's always worth checking those sites.
3:07
And often there is bilateral
3:09
nodal disease when present.
3:10
This particular tumor does
3:12
not demonstrate nodal disease.
3:14
It is important that in addition to MR
3:17
imaging, CT imaging is performed in order
3:19
to supplement one's assessment of the
3:23
status of bone and cortical destruction.
3:26
If PET CT has been performed, these tumors
3:30
are generally FDG avid and intensely avid.
3:34
However, this does not discriminate between
3:36
squamous cell carcinoma and other differential
3:39
diagnoses such as inverted papilloma.
Sidney Levy, PhD, MBBS
Radiologist and Nuclear Medicine Specialist
I-MED
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.