Interactive Transcript
0:01
So there's a new CIS in town.
0:04
Normally we think of CIS as carcinoma in situ,
0:07
but for the neurologists,
0:10
CIS refers to clinically isolated syndrome.
0:15
This is a monophasic presentation with a
0:19
suspicion of an inflammatory
0:21
demyelinating disorder.
0:23
Symptoms are typically of rapid onset
0:25
and last for more than 24 hours.
0:27
So this is the first event, if you will,
0:30
in someone who potentially will have
0:33
multiple sclerosis down the road.
0:35
But this is a solitary event and that's why
0:38
it's called a clinically isolated syndrome.
0:42
Nonetheless,
0:43
these patients with clinically isolated
0:46
syndrome are often imaged because of this new
0:49
neurologic event and get an MRI scan.
0:53
The impact of MRI is very important because of
0:57
those patients who have an abnormal MRI,
1:00
82% will convert to multiple sclerosis
1:04
at some point in the next 20 years.
1:07
If, on the other hand,
1:08
they have a single neurologic
1:10
event with a normal MRI,
1:12
only 21% will develop the diagnosis
1:17
of multiple sclerosis.
1:19
And these are different authors showing that
1:22
the ranges can be 82% to 88%, 19% to 21%.
1:27
But by and large,
1:28
we say that four fifths or more of them with
1:31
an abnormal MRI will convert to multiple
1:35
sclerosis over the course of time.
1:37
If the MRI shows that there is a
1:41
gadolinium enhancing lesion,
1:44
then you have an even higher rate at which
1:48
these patients will convert to multiple
1:51
sclerosis from clinically isolated syndrome.
1:55
In addition, when they convert,
1:57
they have greater disability.
1:59
So this is CIS and you will see on
2:01
your request know CIS evaluation.
2:04
It is the pre-multiple sclerosis evaluation
2:08
hasn't yet fulfilled the clinical criteria of
2:11
multiple episodes of neurologic events,
2:14
but they are suspicious of it and therefore
2:17
looking at the MRI to help guide them.
2:20
In some cases,
2:21
it may help guide therapy because the patients
2:24
may be put on immunosuppressives
2:27
based on the MRI result.
2:29
Now we have CIS, but we also have RIS.
2:33
This is one of my favorite diagnoses.
2:36
These are patients who were not admitted
2:39
with a new neurologic event,
2:41
but have a radiology imaging pattern that
2:46
looks just like multiple sclerosis.
2:49
So these are patients that may be incidentally
2:52
discovered being evaluated, for example,
2:55
for migraine headaches. And lo and behold,
2:58
you find white matter lesions.
3:00
That look just like multiple sclerosis in
3:02
the periventricular and juxtacortical or
3:05
infratentorial location and or enhancing lesions
3:09
in the white matter and non-enhancing lesions.
3:12
But the neurologists and the clinicians have
3:16
no clinical history of a neurologic event.
3:18
This is what is known as radiologically
3:21
isolated syndrome, or RIS.
3:24
8.8% of healthy relatives of patients with
3:28
multiple sclerosis and 4.9% of non-familial
3:33
healthy control subjects may show
3:35
multiple white matter lesions,
3:37
and they may indeed fulfill McDonald criteria
3:41
for multiple sclerosis and yet
3:43
not carry that diagnosis.
3:46
If the patient has enhancing lesions,
3:50
the progression to multiple sclerosis
3:53
increases dramatically.
3:55
So we say if you show an RIS pattern that
3:59
is a multiple sclerosis-like pattern,
4:02
and yet you don't have MS in your diagnosis,
4:07
there's a one-third chance over the course of
4:09
the next three years that you will indeed
4:12
develop multiple sclerosis as defined by the
4:15
clinical criteria, not just imaging criteria.
4:18
If you have enhancing lesions,
4:21
that rate goes up three to fourfold.
4:24
And if you follow these patients,
4:28
even if they don't have neurologic
4:30
symptoms currently,
4:32
they may show progressive MR findings in that
4:34
they may have new MR lesions
4:36
and new enhancing lesions,
4:38
even though they may be asymptomatic
4:41
neurologically.
4:42
So this is radiologically isolated syndrome.
4:46
In fact,
4:46
I wrote a paper with one of my outstanding
4:49
research fellows, Gina Pakpur.
4:51
What we did was we looked at follow-up of
4:55
emergency department MRI scans in patients
4:59
who did not have a diagnosis
5:01
of multiple sclerosis,
5:02
but for whom we saw a pattern
5:05
that looked just like MS.
5:07
And what we found was if we in our reports
5:11
said that this looks like MS, period blank.
5:16
In other words,
5:17
a demyelinating disorder was placed as
5:19
the only differential diagnosis.
5:22
These patients ultimately had a final
5:26
diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
5:29
over the course of time,
5:30
and this was a six-month follow-up.
5:32
In 84.3%,
5:34
if MS was listed as the first in the
5:38
differential diagnosis of a list
5:40
of differential diagnoses,
5:42
then 37.5% of them over the course of the next
5:46
six months had the diagnosis of multiple
5:49
sclerosis made. If it was in the middle,
5:52
like the second or the third or the fourth
5:54
or the fifth th, then as you can see,
5:56
those rates went down precipitously.
5:59
So the point here being that these are
6:01
patients who show from an emergency room MR
6:05
scan not performed for demyelinating
6:07
disorder or even neurologic events.
6:10
If we say this looks like MS,
6:13
i.e.,
6:14
radiologically isolated syndrome,
6:17
and we say this is MS,
6:20
it will be MS in 84.3% as a diagnosis
6:25
within six months.
6:27
If you look out even further
6:29
over the course of time,
6:30
I imagine that this would be even higher.
6:32
But our look back was a six-month look back.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.