Interactive Transcript
0:00
So this next patient is a 50-year-old
0:02
gentleman with cirrhosis.
0:04
We're doing a study, uh, of the abdomen to
0:06
look for potential hepatocellular carcinomas.
0:10
And so, we have our first set of sequences,
0:13
the dynamic post-contrast images.
0:16
And there are actually two
0:17
lesions of interest in the liver.
0:19
One up over here, and one in
0:21
the left hepatic lobe over here.
0:24
And both really have very similar imaging
0:26
features, so I'm going to focus on the one
0:27
that's larger in the right hepatic lobe.
0:30
So this is our T1 Fatsat post-contrast image.
0:35
We have the arterial phase over here,
0:36
the portal venous phase over here.
0:38
We can see a lesion, uh, really at the
0:41
periphery of segment eight over here that
0:44
has non-RIM arterial phase hyperenhancement.
0:49
It's certainly larger than
0:51
20 millimeters in size.
0:53
On the portal venous phase
0:55
images, this demonstrates washout.
0:58
And a very, very thin rim around it,
1:00
so that's going to be the pseudocapsule.
1:03
So based on all these criteria,
1:05
this qualifies as a LI-RADS 5 lesion.
1:08
And if we look at our other lesion,
1:10
seen more inferiorly and in the left
1:11
hepatic lobe in segment 3, very,
1:13
very similar imaging features, right?
1:16
There's non-RIM arterial phase hyperenhancement.
1:21
It's certainly just about
1:23
larger than 20 millimeters.
1:24
There's washout on the
1:26
portal venous phase images.
1:28
We can see a pseudocapsule.
1:29
By all accounts, this is a LI-RADS 5.
1:31
And this was presented to the tumor board,
1:34
and it was deemed that a transarterial,
1:36
uh, chemoembolization approach would be
1:38
the best way to treat these tumors.
1:41
And so that was performed in this patient,
1:43
and a subsequent study was performed to evaluate
1:46
the treatment response of that treatment.
1:49
So these are the
1:49
post-treatment scans in our patient.
1:51
This is a T1
1:52
Fatsat post-contrast image.
1:55
This is the arterial phase.
1:56
This is the portal venous phase.
1:58
Again, we're looking at the subtraction
1:59
images in order to take away some of
2:02
that T1 hyperintense content that
2:04
may be present after these ablations.
2:06
And again, as with all ablations, we're
2:08
really looking for avascular cavities.
2:11
And so we can see a cavity now in that,
2:13
uh, in place of that segment 8 lesion.
2:15
Internally, it looks like there may be
2:17
some bright signal, but if you look at the pre-
2:19
contrast images, in this image, all this turns
2:22
out to be artifact from misregistration.
2:25
If you look at the portal venous phase
2:26
images, it really does look quite
2:27
nice and clean on the inside of it.
2:30
The outside of it has this
2:31
relatively thick rind of enhancement.
2:34
And particularly for the first few,
2:37
first study post-treatment, that's
2:38
not an abnormal finding to see.
2:41
You may even see some enhancement surrounding
2:43
the lesion itself that's separate from
2:45
that rind of tissue around the cavity.
2:48
And again, it's important to just look
2:50
at that, acknowledge it, and see what
2:52
happens to it on subsequent studies.
2:54
Does it stay the same in size, or does
2:56
it diminish, which is what we expect?
2:58
Either stay the same or diminish, or
2:59
does it get thicker, more nodular?
3:02
Alright, so that's what we're looking for.
3:04
And these, uh, post-treatment cavities.
3:06
If we look at our other lesion as well,
3:08
over here in segment three, this also
3:10
demonstrates very similar imaging features.
3:12
No internal vascularity and the rind of
3:17
enhancement, which is relatively normal.
3:20
Make sure that stays similar or
3:22
diminishes, but never gets thicker.
3:24
And so both these cavities have been
3:26
successfully treated by transarterial
3:27
chemoembolization. And we can then follow
3:30
up how they look on subsequent studies.
3:32
Thanks.
3:33
Thanks.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.