Interactive Transcript
0:00
Let's take a look at a 3 Tesla MRI using a
0:05
pelvic array coil and compare it to the 1.5T
0:07
comp vignette, which you'll
0:10
see labeled on MRI online.
0:13
This is an 81-year-old, and of course, as you
0:16
get older, the incidence of low-grade cancers
0:18
goes up, so it's really important to discriminate
0:21
who has an aggressive cancer and who doesn't.
0:24
And you're going to do that by size, by boundary
0:27
crossing, by hypervascularity, But especially by the
0:31
diffusion characteristics and the morphology of the
0:35
lesion, whether it's crossing key boundaries or not.
0:38
This patient had a negative biopsy,
0:41
uh, two years prior to this study.
0:43
And the PSA wasn't really elevated.
0:45
It was hovering about, around 2.4.
0:47
18 00:00:48,169 --> 00:00:50,380 But yet the clinician felt
0:50
something on physical examination.
0:52
And this is the perfect patient to have an MR.
0:56
You know, the clinical exam's
0:58
positive, the PSA, non-contributory.
1:01
And the patient is 81 years of age.
1:05
The patient also had a family history.
1:07
So let's look at the axial T2-weighted image.
1:10
And there is an area of ill-defined
1:13
hypointensity in the PZL and PZP, or
1:17
posterolateral and posterior aspect of the gland.
1:21
And it's ill-defined with a
1:23
fair amount of capsular contact.
1:26
We lose to some degree the nice black line
1:29
as it comes around, so we're, we're a little
1:30
concerned about microcapsular invasion.
1:34
We still do see the little dots of the neurovascular
1:38
bundle in the 5 o'clock at 7 o'clock position,
1:42
5 o'clock over here, 7 o'clock over here.
1:45
And so we turn to our T1-weighted image.
1:48
I'd prefer to have an axial T1, but I'm blessed
1:53
at least with this coronal, and I'm looking at
1:55
the neurovascular bundle right in the area of
1:57
the tumor, so I'm scrolling backwards to that
1:59
area of ill-defined character, and I really don't
2:02
see any effacement of the fat on either side.
2:05
I still see the veins and the neurovascular
2:08
structures, that's a nerve right there.
2:10
And so they're unencumbered by the tumor.
2:13
So we're not going to give this patient gross invasion.
2:17
There may be microcapsular invasion.
2:20
Now let's turn our attention to the
2:22
diffusion image, by the way, at 3 Tesla.
2:25
And I'd like you to compare back and
2:26
forth this 3 Tesla study with the 1.
2:30
5 comp image that was a PI 5, like this
2:34
one, to look at the Disparity and image
2:37
quality of which there really isn't any.
2:40
And here is your axial diffusion
2:43
image at a higher B value.
2:45
Here's the low B value, here's the higher B value.
2:47
Not all that bright for this tumor.
2:49
Let's go to another image at another locus.
2:53
Not all that bright.
2:54
I'm going to window it a little tighter.
2:56
Let's go back to the one that I think
2:57
is a little more impressive right there.
2:59
So not as bright as I might like.
3:02
Let's go to something with a slightly
3:04
higher B value, a single image.
3:07
And it's a little bit brighter.
3:09
So, why on this image with the low B
3:12
value and the high B value, low B value,
3:14
high B value, why wasn't it as bright?
3:17
Well, the main reason was that the B value
3:21
for this particular image wasn't high enough.
3:24
I want the B value to be 1200 or greater.
3:27
But let's talk about, for a moment, the causes
3:31
for false positive and false negative diffusion
3:35
imaging because diffusion imaging is the
3:38
major criteria for peripheral zone lesions.
3:41
That's point one.
3:44
Point two, causes of false positive and negative
3:48
diffusion imaging, which we'll get to in a second.
3:51
And point three, you have to know
3:54
what causes diffusion restriction.
3:56
And what does?
3:58
Hypercellularity, cell packing, necrosis, as
4:03
many of us see in the brain, say with heroin
4:06
encephalopathy, infarcts, like we see in the
4:10
brain, with destruction or breakdown of the cell
4:13
membrane where the water gets trapped in the cell,
4:17
hyperviscosity, as might occur with, say, a cerebral
4:21
abscess or an epidermoid, and inciting desmoplasia,
4:27
where the interstitium becomes very stiff and firm.
4:31
So now let's talk about item number two of
4:35
our three points, which is the causes for
4:38
false positive and negative diffusion.
4:41
One obvious cause, the spatial
4:43
resolution just isn't good enough.
4:46
Typically, you're not going to get great
4:48
diffusion unless you've got a lesion that's at
4:50
least five millimeters in cubic centimeters.
4:56
Mucinous tumors, fortunately they're
4:58
rare, but they don't restrict.
5:01
But nine very cellular nodules In the TZ, and
5:05
sometimes proliferating into the PZ, these can
5:10
restrict, so this is a cause of a false positive.
5:15
So in the central region, or TZ of the prostate,
5:18
diffusion restriction is not a major criteria.
5:22
It's a supplement.
5:24
If it's positive, it helps with
5:26
a suspicious morphologic lesion.
5:29
If it's negative, it helps.
5:31
It really doesn't help you all that much.
5:33
But you can't use diffusion imaging on
5:36
its own in the TZ or transitional zone.
5:39
Abscesses.
5:41
These are going to restrict inside
5:44
where there's hyperviscosity.
5:46
This is also known as the vanilla donut sign.
5:50
Because you've got the white vanilla in the
5:52
middle on the diffusion-weighted image and the
5:56
solid portion of the donut around the outside.
6:00
In a tumor, the diffusion restriction
6:03
is more peripherally oriented.
6:05
So the brighter signal is going to be on the
6:07
outside, the darker signal on the diffusion.
6:10
Not the ADC map, on the diffusion.
6:13
The brighter signal will be on the outside,
6:15
the darker signal will be on the inside,
6:17
so we call this the chocolate donut sign.
6:22
And then, as we said, any cytotoxic or
6:25
necrotic edema can diffusion restrict, and
6:28
this can rarely occur in the prostate gland.
6:32
Now, some other critical causes of,
6:34
of failure to diffusion restrict.
6:37
Well, one is low-grade tumor, you know, Gleason 5 or 6.
6:41
The B value, as we said, not high enough.
6:43
Gotta have that B value 1,200 or more.
6:46
And then another one, perhaps the reason why this
6:50
B value did not at 1,000 show the tumor as well.
6:54
One, the B value wasn't high enough,
6:56
and two, there's air in the rectum.
6:59
So air in the rectum may inhibit your ability
7:02
to get a nice, crisp diffusion restriction.
7:06
So let's draw these donut signs.
7:08
So in abscess, we're gonna have lower signal intensity.
7:13
around the outside on the DWI, say
7:16
B1600, and on the inside where there's
7:19
hyperviscosity, it's going to be bright.
7:23
That's our vanilla donut sign.
7:26
If we've got a tumor, it's going to be the opposite.
7:31
We're going to have diffusion
7:33
restriction on the outside.
7:35
We're probably going to have less
7:37
diffusion restriction on the inside.
7:41
The so-called chocolate doughnut sign.
7:43
And if you want to be a purist, maybe
7:45
I should make the chocolate brown.
7:47
Because chocolate is brown.
7:49
So this would be the tumor chocolate doughnut sign.
7:53
And in the middle, this would be
7:56
the abscess vanilla doughnut sign.
8:00
Now I want to share one other thing
8:01
with you on this 3 Tesla study.
8:03
So let's get out of our drawing tool for
8:06
a minute, and let's go to the DCE MRI.
8:11
The Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
8:14
So let's match it up with our Axial T2.
8:17
Let's go right to that spot, and here's our mask.
8:22
Now immediately, right after the contrast arrives.
8:25
Mask, contrast arrival, boom.
8:28
Yes, these nodules in the middle
8:30
are enhancing, very common.
8:33
So, you really can't use Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
8:37
unless you have a big charcoal-like smearing mass with
8:41
very intense enhancement and very obvious washout.
8:46
In the periphery, we do see, as an isolated
8:48
phenomenon, first 10 seconds, enhancement,
8:53
In the PZL, lateral, and PZP, posterior.
8:58
Let's keep going.
8:58
It's getting brighter.
9:01
It's getting brighter.
9:03
It's getting brighter.
9:05
And now it's getting a little less
9:07
bright compared to the rest of the gland.
9:10
So it's starting to wash out.
9:13
So the curve in this one is
9:15
looking something like this.
9:17
Came up pretty quick.
9:20
And it takes a little while and then
9:22
it starts to drop off towards the end.
9:26
Now you can quantify this with a CAD, with a color map.
9:30
Let's see what the color map said about it.
9:31
Let's see if it picked it up.
9:34
And indeed it did.
9:35
Right there.
9:36
It also picked up these innumerable TZ
9:40
central region of the gland areas of
9:41
hypervascularity which are extremely common.
9:45
So our DCE MRI said that the lesion was hypervascular,
9:50
fire engine red, and that had a pretty decent washout.
9:58
So, I don't rely on the hue very
10:00
much in CAD for the prostate.
10:02
I do rely it, rely on it in the breast, so I'm gonna
10:06
ignore the hue or shade of red 'cause I don't think
10:08
it's reliable And all I'm doing is looking for hyper
10:12
vascularity in the PZ to see if that corroborates my
10:17
tumor, but also helps me decide how vascular it is.
10:22
For the more vascular it is earlier on,
10:24
the more likely it is to be aggressive.
10:27
The more intense the signal intensity on diffusion
10:31
weighted imaging, the quicker the rise from low
10:34
B values to high B values, the more aggressive
10:37
the tumor, and the more hypo dense, or hypo
10:42
intense, the signal is on the ADC parametric
10:45
map, the more likely the tumor is aggressive.
10:49
Let's take a look at our ADC map, and here it is.
10:54
Not quite as black as I would have
10:55
expected, but it is present, it is there.
10:59
And again, the blacker it is, the more
11:01
aggressive it's going to be on the ADC map.
11:05
3 Tesla study, posterolateral tumor.
11:09
This would be a PI-RADS 4/5.
11:12
Depending upon whether we
11:13
measure it out at less than 1.5 or
11:16
greater than 1.5.
11:17
228 00:11:18,599 --> 00:11:20,440 The reader said slightly greater than 1.5.ss
11:20
230 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:23,640 I measured it, I got slightly less than 1.5.
11:23
232 00:11:24,030 --> 00:11:26,289 So I'd be reading it as a PI-RADS 4.
11:26
The reader read it as a PI-RADS 5.
11:29
This looks like a moderately aggressive lesion.
11:31
Diffusion image, not that bright.
11:34
ADC map, not that dark.
11:37
Hypervascularity, some.
11:39
In fact, moderate.
11:41
Compare this to our 1.5
11:42
comp vignette.
11:44
That concludes this one.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.