Interactive Transcript
0:00
Okay, we've got a 67-year-old man
0:03
with low back and left hip pain
0:05
and a history of a left hip fracture.
0:09
At three Tesla, we've got a sagittal T2 fast spin echo
0:14
without any fat suppression.
0:15
In the middle, we've got a standard anatomy
0:18
T1-weighted image.
0:19
And on the right, an axial standard
0:22
T2 fast spin echo image.
0:24
I haven't put up anything that's extremely water-weighted.
0:27
We might use that, say, to look for fractures.
0:30
Let me blow it up a little bit.
0:32
Or hotspots, or areas of edema that would point
0:35
us in the direction of potential pathology.
0:37
So the history is a little bit amorphous,
0:40
but it localizes somewhat to the left.
0:43
Now, we do have a slip at L4 on L5,
0:46
a very degenerated disc and a very narrow foramen.
0:49
But if I cross-reference that,
0:51
which I'm not going to do right now for interest
0:53
of time, it's on the right side,
0:55
it's on the incorrect side.
0:57
The patient's symptoms are in the left hip,
1:00
and that doesn't look nearly
1:02
as bad as the other side.
1:03
So maybe the left hip pain is from the fracture,
1:07
not from this slippage. So we're too ladling along,
1:11
and some of you might notice that this part
1:13
of the sacrum looks a little strange.
1:16
It's a bit empty.
1:17
There's this globular area of intermediate
1:20
signal intensity.
1:21
We've got roots up high that are flopping about
1:24
and dangling nicely, but no roots here,
1:26
so that's problematic.
1:28
Time to go to the axial projection.
1:30
So let's go back to the axial projection and
1:32
look at where we are.
1:33
We're up high,
1:34
and we're going to scooch up and down.
1:36
And as you do so,
1:38
I would advise you not to ignore the
1:41
atheromatous change in the aorta,
1:43
because sometime you're going to run into 40, 50,
1:46
60% atheromatous change.
1:48
The patient is going to have claudication
1:51
that's vascular in nature,
1:53
or they're going to have thromboembolism
1:54
the cause of their syndrome.
1:55
So do not ignore the atherosclerosis or size of
1:59
the aorta. So as we're toggling down, yeah,
2:02
we've got facet arthropathy,
2:03
but we've got some beautiful, dangling,
2:06
delicate roots. All is well in the land of Oz.
2:10
Or not. Let's pull down the lower axial images,
2:15
which really tell the story.
2:16
I'm going to blow them up a little bigger.
2:19
In fact, a lot bigger.
2:21
And all of a sudden, our dangling,
2:23
delicate roots turn into these lumpy, bumpy,
2:28
irregular objects. In fact,
2:30
it looks like we have a big filum terminale there,
2:33
but we don't. So what's going on?
2:36
Well, this is a post-op,
2:40
but it's also potentially a pre-op, right?
2:42
Meaning this patient's still having symptoms.
2:44
So you're being asked, okay,
2:46
can we do anything about that?
2:48
And this identification Dr.
2:50
Pomeran just made is really important.
2:52
Okay. That nerve root clumping is arachnoiditis.
2:56
So there is a problem, either inflammatory.
3:00
Or something that has caused the nerve roots to
3:03
stick together, and that can be symptomatic,
3:05
meaning you can get back and leg pain from that.
3:09
So if you're contemplating any
3:11
sort of surgical remedy,
3:12
you have to be sure that your problem is compressive
3:14
to begin with. And as you pointed out,
3:16
we already have a couple of discrepancies
3:18
the side of predominant symptoms.
3:20
The patient's already had a decompression, okay?
3:24
Symptoms are on the left,
3:25
and the worst is on the right, right?
3:27
So if there's arachnoiditis,
3:31
that really affects the idea,
3:33
even if there is a compressive component to it,
3:35
as there could be,
3:37
what's the outlook? And the outlook is a lot worse.
3:41
Well, a couple of other comments.
3:43
We've got this sort of globular,
3:45
almost glom-like area of signal change.
3:48
A little bit of it is ossified in signal.
3:52
So while we might be volume averaging
3:55
a little bit from the back,
3:55
we might have a little bit of
3:57
arachnoiditis ossificans.
3:59
But what we do have clearly on the right
4:01
is what I call the empty sac sign.
4:04
So, when you're looking for arachnoiditis,
4:06
this is our dural sac.
4:07
And normally inside you'd have a few delicate
4:10
nerve roots like this. But in this case,
4:12
all the nerve roots are lined up like little
4:16
structures all in a row around the periphery.
4:18
They're out here kind of lumpy and bumpy,
4:21
hugging the edge of the dura.
4:23
And there's nothing in the middle.
4:25
The whole center is empty.
4:27
So that's one sign of arachnoiditis.
4:30
Another sign of arachnoiditis is also present here,
4:35
and that's when you have these pseudomasses.
4:37
So, once again, we've got a sac.
4:40
We'll make our sac just to be consistent,
4:42
we'll make it orange. And then inside the sac,
4:45
we've got structures that look kind of like this.
4:48
Whoops didn't get the right color on there?
4:50
Here we go. So it looks kind of like this.
4:54
So the pseudomass sign.
4:56
Then we've also got something called the dural
4:59
thickening sign, which this patient also has.
5:01
I mean, it's all here: dogs and cats living together,
5:04
ten days of darkness, the plague, mass hysteria.
5:07
It's all in this case.
5:09
Look at this sac. Check it out.
5:11
Down low, we'll make our sac green this time,
5:14
but look at the edge of the sac, it's too thick.
5:17
So we've got a third sign of arachnoiditis,
5:21
and finally a fourth sign of arachnoiditis,
5:24
which we sort of have here when you get up
5:26
higher is the pseudochord sign.
5:29
Now,
5:30
we have a better example of this,
5:31
but in this situation, you have a sac,
5:35
and then inside it,
5:36
all the nerve roots have just glued together right
5:39
in the middle and produced something
5:40
that looks like a cord or a CONUS.
5:43
So virtually every single sign of arachnoiditis
5:46
is present, in this case,
5:48
most likely occurring postoperatively.
5:51
So what are some other possibilities for
5:54
arachnoiditis, etiologically?
5:58
Well, surgery as. Mentioned,
6:00
but there are other possibilities.
6:01
For example, trauma.
6:03
Let's say somebody had a hemorrhage, all right?
6:05
So anything that gives you an inflammatory problem
6:08
inside the sac has that potential.
6:11
Now, you also will see it with very severe stenosis.
6:15
And you see you don't know that because you see the
6:18
cauda equina all squeezed because of severe stenosis.
6:21
You decompress and the sac opens up,
6:24
but the roots stay all clumped together
6:26
and you're in trouble there.
6:27
Those people do not do very well and it's very hard
6:30
to say beforehand what that's going to be like
6:33
because you don't know if it's from Extrinsic
6:35
Compression or Arachnoiditis.
6:37
So I would say those are the two most common causes.
6:40
There are other things out there.
6:42
There are injections.
6:43
We used to use contrast agents in the spine that
6:46
were shown to be taken off the market for causing
6:48
arachnoiditis. There are some infections,
6:51
inflammatory causes.
6:53
Let me ask you a question because this comes up for
6:54
me all the time. You've got severe stenosis,
6:57
let's say, at this level.
6:58
And then the nerve roots,
6:59
I'm going to make my line a lot thinner.
7:01
And then the nerve roots kind of get pushed up and
7:05
they get very squiggly and wiggly right
7:07
above the area of stenosis.
7:09
And there are times when I'm not sure if those roots
7:12
are just kind of pushed up or whether they're
7:15
pushed up and they're adherent.
7:16
Is there any way to tell or is it
7:19
a surgical diagnosis only? Well,
7:21
you will get that sort of corkscrewing thing
7:24
is some terminology that I've read.
7:26
But usually you'll be able to see that even though
7:29
if the roots kind of are a little redundant on
7:31
themselves, there will be CSF between them.
7:34
Okay?
7:34
Whereas this pseudomass where there's nothing there
7:38
except the mass of something that is a little more
7:41
worrisome. And if there's severe stenosis,
7:44
if there's severe stenosis and the
7:47
patient is really symptomatic,
7:49
you are probably going to give that a try.
7:53
Another thing would be what is their response,
7:56
for example, to epidural steroid injections?
7:58
And I think that extrinsic compression is going
8:02
to respond better than arachnoiditis will be.
8:05
So if they respond to an epidural steroid and they
8:07
have that history, that activity history,
8:09
whereas I think arachnoiditis is not going to
8:12
have that classic stenosis activity history,
8:16
it's going to be more constant pain,
8:19
not activity related, not posture related as much.
8:22
I mean, they can overlap to some degree,
8:24
but on a historical basis,
8:25
you can also probably help yourself a little bit.
8:27
So three things then.
8:29
The three things are confluence.
8:32
You don't see any CSF in between these little
8:35
squiggly lines. That would be one.
8:38
The second one would be response perhaps to steroid
8:43
injection and the third one would be
8:46
positional or symptom-related.
8:48
Arachnoiditis is there all the time,
8:50
whereas stenosis,
8:52
they can get some relief in one position or other.
8:55
And I think that's really important because this
8:57
comes up all the time and I'm going to show a case.
9:00
Very similar to this,
9:01
where we have the nerve roots kind of clumped above
9:06
the area of stenosis, and this comes up.
9:08
So in summary, then arachnoiditis,
9:11
we've got all the major signs of arachnoiditis.
9:14
We've got a pseudochord sign,
9:16
we have mass-like lesions inside as a sign,
9:19
we've got thickening of the dural sac as a sign,
9:22
and we've got an empty sac sign,
9:24
all indicative of arachnoiditis.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.