Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 5, Case 4 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

History, she's a 58-year-old who had

0:03

remote implants placed for cosmesis.

0:07

So these are remote cosmetic

0:09

implants and she had newly diagnosed.

0:13

Yes, but we're going to pause on the, and

0:17

we're mainly just going to look at our

0:18

implants because it's really nice example.

0:20

So our teaching points here for

0:22

this case is 1st of all, you have

0:23

to have the right sequences, right?

0:24

You need to have, you need to have

0:27

implant silicone-specific sequences.

0:30

Um, where you actually, um, and just make sure

0:35

that each of your sites do just that.

0:38

You also have to suppress. You want to

0:40

suppress everything except silicone,

0:43

which means you also want to suppress

0:45

these two weights are weighted are great.

0:47

But they don't also suppress, um, fluid.

0:50

So normal water.

0:51

And so you want a specific where you also

0:54

suppress second, but these are, um, very

0:59

evident, um, implant, um, uh, integrity

1:03

issues bilaterally in the right breast.

1:06

Um, in addition, I'm going to show you better

1:08

on the sagittal images, but in addition to some

1:10

wavy lines that are in there that are longer,

1:13

some of which will have keyhole or new skin.

1:18

Morphology on zoom type

1:20

images and on sagittal images.

1:23

In addition to that,

1:25

our right implant also so that

1:27

would be intracapsular rupture.

1:28

These Linguine signs, but our right

1:31

implant also has extracapsular rupture.

1:33

Let me show you the more.

1:36

Uh, the better slash more

1:39

appropriate because our T2.

1:42

Uh, it's not a trim or T2 weighted it,

1:45

um, the water has also been suppressed.

1:48

So this is a nice example of our right implant.

1:51

Nice example of wavy, um, of wavy.

1:55

Linguine sign, got a couple of

1:58

pictures here if I keep scrolling.

2:00

You're going to actually be able to see

2:01

in the contralateral resonates new sign,

2:04

but you can see quite readily the extra.

2:07

Extracapsular rupture as well remember

2:09

the capsule is not the implant shell.

2:12

So the word capsule refers to the endogenous

2:15

capsule that the patient herself has developed.

2:19

I know we talked about that in week 3

2:21

and when we're talking about about the.

2:24

The integrity of the, of the implant cover

2:29

that's called the shell just FYI, just

2:31

in terms of getting the words correct.

2:33

All right.

2:33

So that's a so this is a nice example

2:35

of intracapsular and extracapsular.

2:37

I remember the...

2:39

You hardly ever have extracapsular

2:41

rupture without intracapsular rupture.

2:43

So I think it's a fair assessment to

2:46

assume intracapsular rupture when the

2:49

predominant findings extracapsular.

2:51

We had a couple of had a couple of you comment.

2:55

Quite appropriately on the extra-

2:57

capsular rupture of this implant,

3:01

but not the intracapsular.

3:03

So I just wanted to make you aware of that.

3:05

And then the contralateral

3:08

breast is a nice example.

3:09

That's a good, that's a good new sign.

3:11

So that can't be even a long radial.

3:14

Even a long radial fold, that's

3:16

a, that's a bit of a new sign.

3:18

There we go.

3:18

There it is coming into play.

3:21

And then just, and then really nice

3:23

Linguine and some subcapsular lines.

3:25

So, bilateral implant rupture, um, arguably,

3:28

um, I'm looking, I looked at this case a

3:30

little while ago and I was like, wait a minute.

3:32

I wonder why we didn't call

3:32

extracapsular rupture on this.

3:35

Um, I think we probably should have in

3:37

retrospect, although truthfully, most

3:39

of you just called this intracapsular

3:40

rupture and, uh, called the contralateral

3:43

intracapsular and extracapsular.

3:45

So, uh, you, you agreed

3:46

with us, or I'm not sure.

3:48

I agree with us at this point,

3:50

but it's kind of a moot point.

3:52

I think I also made the point that now

3:55

we do very few for implant integrity,

3:59

but I wanted to wrap that up just in

4:01

terms of assuring that you did know this.

4:04

This was not for implant integrity.

4:06

This was for her and it was just garden variety.

4:10

The patient did very well.

4:11

Um, and.

4:13

But we included it because of the bilateral

4:17

implant issues and hers had merely quote failed.

4:20

Remember, it's called implant failure.

4:22

Now, a lot of plastic surgeons

4:23

don't even call it rupture.

4:24

They just call it failure or they, they say

4:27

they talk about implant integrity rather than

4:29

implant rupture or the lack of implant integrity

4:33

just because there is an expectation that the

4:36

implants are going to, are going to fail, going

4:39

to rupture, sorry, and patients are, fail.

4:42

Uh, at least, at least most of the places that

4:45

I'm now covering, which I'm traipsing across

4:47

America right now in my new roles, um, but are,

4:50

um, are doing far fewer implant integrity MRs.

Report

HISTORY: 58 year old woman status post remote bilateral implants with newly diagnosed right breast DCIS and papillomas presented for extent of disease

Summary of prior imaging:

Mammography: Bilateral silicone implants and developing asymmetry RLOQ
Ultrasound: Ductal dilation and multifocal intraductal masses right breast middle depth RLOQ
Breast MRI: None

FINDINGS

Quality control issues: ☐None ☐Poor/lack contrast bolus ☒Poor fat suppression [Sag T1 Fat Sat sequence on right] ☐Susceptibility ☐Movement ☐Other

Background Parenchymal Enhancement: Minimal
Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue: Scattered fibroglandular tissue

LEFT BREAST

Narrative
Status post left retroglandular silicone breast implant with intracapsular rupture. No suspicious enhancing masses or areas of non-mass enhancement. No axillary or internal mammary adenopathy is seen. No abnormal skin or pectoralis muscle enhancement.

Left breast lesion 1
Lesion type: Choose an item.

Longest measurement cm. Choose an item Quadrant. Choose an item. Radian. dist from nipple cm from the nipple

BI-RADS: 2: Benign: Routine breast MRI screening if cumulative lifetime risk =>20%

Associated findings LEFT: ☒NONE, ☐Nipple retraction, ☐Nipple involvement, ☐Skin retraction, ☐Skin thickening, ☐Skin invasion-direct, ☐Skin invasion-inflammatory, ☐Pectoral muscle invasion, ☐Chest wall invasion, ☐ Architectural distortion

Non-enhancing findings LEFT: ☒NONE, ☐High ductal signal pre contrast T1, ☐Cyst(s), ☐Hematoma/seroma, ☐Post therapy skin/trabecular thickening, ☐Non-enhancing mass, ☐Architectural distortion, ☒Signal void in the skin

Fat containing lesions LEFT: ☒NONE, ☐Fat necrosis, ☐Hamartoma, ☐Post-operative seroma/hematoma with fat

Lymph nodes LEFT: ☒Normal axillary, ☐Signal void from clips, ☐Abnormal axillary, ☐Abnormal internal mammary

RIGHT BREAST

Narrative
Status post right retroglandular silicone breast implant with intracapsular and extracapsular rupture. 10 cm span of lower outer quadrant ductal T2 and T1 bright signal extending toward the nipple, some of which enhances on delayed imaging in persistent pattern, with biopsy cavity seen. No suspicious enhancing masses. No axillary or internal mammary adenopathy is seen. No abnormal skin or pectoralis muscle enhancement.

Right breast lesion 1
Lesion type: Non-mass enhancement
6.5 cm. Lower outer Quadrant. 7:00 Radian. Pointing toward and away from the nipple

BI-RADS: 6: Known biopsy-proven malignancy: Surgical excision when clinically appropriate

Associated findings RIGHT: ☒NONE, ☐Nipple retraction, ☐Nipple involvement, ☐Skin retraction, ☐Skin thickening, ☐Skin invasion-direct, ☐Skin invasion-inflammatory, ☐Pectoral muscle invasion, ☐Chest wall invasion, ☐ Architectural distortion

Non-enhancing findings RIGHT: ☐NONE, ☒High ductal signal pre contrast T1, ☐Cyst(s), ☒Hematoma/seroma, ☐Post therapy skin/trabecular thickening, ☐Non-enhancing mass, ☐Architectural distortion, ☒Signal void from clips

Fat containing lesions RIGHT: ☒NONE, ☐Fat necrosis, ☐Hamartoma, ☐Post-operative seroma/hematoma with fat

Lymph nodes RIGHT: ☒Normal axillary, ☐Abnormal axillary, ☐ Abnormal internal mammary

Extramammary findings: None

SUMMARY: Biopsy-proven DCIS and papillomas right breast. Bilateral ruptured silicone implants

LEFT BI-RADS: 2: Negative
RIGHT BI-RADS: 6: Known biopsy-proven malignancy: Surgical excision when clinically appropriate

RECOMMENDATIONS: Surgical excision when clinically appropriate

Case Discussion

Faculty

Petra J Lewis, MBBS

Professor of Radiology and OBGYN

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center & Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

Sheryl G. Jordan, MD

Professor, Department of Radiology

University of North Carolina School of Medicine

Ryan W. Woods, MD, MPH

Assistant Professor of Radiology

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Tags

Women's Health

MRI

Breast

© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.

Contact UsTerms of UsePrivacy Policy