Interactive Transcript
0:01
Aneurysms are a more common source of "worst"
0:04
headache of life and subarachnoid hemorrhage
0:07
than arteriovenous malformations or fistulae.
0:10
Nonetheless, each of them may cause
0:13
subarachnoid hemorrhage and bleed and
0:15
lead to the presentation of headache.
0:18
This was a relatively subtle example of
0:21
a CT scan where we noticed that there
0:24
were multiple areas of calcification.
0:28
And hyperdensity without evidence
0:31
of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
0:33
These multiple little calcifications raise the
0:35
possibility of things like cysticercosis or a
0:39
calcified neoplasm such as oligodendroglioma.
0:44
You could see that there is a little bit
0:46
of midline shift at the level of the septum
0:51
pellucidum, and this lesion had some mass effect.
0:55
The patient was referred for MRI scanning.
1:00
Whoa.
1:01
So here we see on the MRI scan that this
1:06
is a very large arteriovenous malformation.
1:10
We do indeed have mass effect with midline
1:13
shift at the level of the septum pellucidum, but
1:15
it's due to this lesion that has multiple
1:18
flow voids of an arteriovenous malformation.
1:23
And this is the T2-weighted scan.
1:25
Here we have post-gadolinium.
1:28
On the post-gadolinium hand scan,
1:29
you might say, "Well, it's an enhancing lesion.
1:32
Maybe it's a tumor."
1:33
The key here is to identify flow-
1:37
related phase ghosting artifact.
1:40
You notice that there is something that is coursing
1:43
across the plane here, identifying that there
1:47
is vascular flow pulsation from this lesion,
1:52
which is indeed an arteriovenous malformation.
1:56
So, subarachnoid hemorrhage may be
1:59
associated with arteriovenous malformations.
2:02
The rate at which an arteriovenous malformation
2:06
bleeds into the subarachnoid space
2:09
is quoted as 1 to 2% per year and, therefore,
2:13
less than the asymptomatic aneurysm, which
2:17
bleeds at approximately 2 to 3% per year.
2:21
One of the benefits of using MRI for the evaluation
2:25
of an arteriovenous malformation is that if you see
2:28
hemorrhagic products, hemosiderin staining
2:32
associated with the AVM, that suggests that the
2:34
lesion has bled in the past and, therefore, the
2:38
rate of bleeding in the future is higher if it
2:42
has demonstrated previous hemorrhage than if
2:45
it has not demonstrated previous hemorrhage.
2:47
So, this is another example of a
2:50
source of the "worst headache of life."
2:53
Here is an angiogram showing an
2:56
arteriovenous malformation.
2:58
You have the
2:59
sagittal T1-weighted MRI scan.
3:02
When we look at an arteriovenous malformation, we also
3:07
look at the drainage pattern and the size of the lesion.
3:11
And this is because of something known
3:13
as the Spetzler-Martin AVM grading system.
3:18
This is a grading system that tells the surgical
3:23
complication rate or the outcome with surgery
3:27
for arteriovenous malformation. In this
3:30
grading system, there are three components: the
3:34
size of the arteriovenous malformation,
3:39
and whether or not it affects eloquent cortex.
3:42
By that, we mean the motor strip,
3:43
speech areas, etc.
3:46
And the drainage of the lesion—if it's
3:49
less than three centimeters, it gets one point.
3:52
If it's three to six centimeters, it gets two points.
3:54
If it's greater than six centimeters, it gets
3:57
three points.
3:58
If it involves an eloquent area, we give it a point.
4:01
If it has deep drainage, it gets a point.
4:05
If it's superficially draining to superficial veins
4:08
or to the superior sagittal sinus, as opposed
4:11
to deep drainage to the internal cerebral
4:13
vein, straight sinus, or vein of Galen.
4:16
Again, these factors suggest a better
4:19
surgical outcome when the numbers are lower.
4:24
A worse surgical outcome may lead
4:26
the surgeon to suggest trying
4:28
endovascular treatment or even radiation
4:33
treatment for the arteriovenous malformation.
© 2025 Medality. All Rights Reserved.