Case 25 - Odontoid Fractures: Summary
HIDEInteractive Transcript
0:01
Let's review some examples of the different types of odontoid
0:05
fractures on sagittal and coronal reconstructed CT scan.
0:11
So that fracture, which involves the tip of the odontoid process,
0:15
maybe even off center,
0:17
is the Type I Odontoid fracture seen on the sagittal
0:22
and the axial scan, just the top of the odontoid process.
0:26
Type II is at the base of the odontoid process,
0:30
and it doesn't extend into the vertebral body.
0:33
And you see that on the sagittal and coronal reconstructions
0:38
of this example of Type II Odontoid process.
0:41
The classic Type III Odontoid process,
0:44
you see the fracture line extending into the vertebral
0:47
body going down more inferiorly on the sagittal scan.
0:52
You see also there's abnormal angulation here,
0:55
and that extension into the body represents the
1:00
between Type III from Type II Odontoid fractures.
1:05
Here is a Type III odontoid fracture where you see that
1:09
there is extension into the inferior portion of the C2
1:14
body. Here it is angulated, inferiorly and anteriorly,
1:19
not just involving the odontoid process,
1:22
but getting into the body.
1:23
And not only that,
1:24
but you see a little bit of an offset right
1:26
here representing the lowest
1:28
most portion of this fracture and extension even
1:32
into the posterior portion of the arch here.
1:36
This is the plane of the fracture into the vertebral body
1:41
that you're seeing representing the lowest portion
1:45
of the Type III Odontoid fracture on axial scan.
1:48
We're actually scanning right through this level,
1:50
and you can see it's a side by side,
1:53
right to left transverse fracture fragment.
1:57
We want to contrast the Type I
2:00
odontoid fracture of the tip of the odontoid
2:04
process from the Os odontoideum.
2:07
How do we distinguish an Os odontoideum from
2:10
a fracture of the tip of the odontoid process?
2:14
Well, you notice that this is a well defined,
2:18
well corticated piece of bone that is
2:21
associated with the C1 vertebra.
2:24
And there is this gap between the lower odontoid process and
2:30
the upper odontoid process. This is a congenital abnormality,
2:34
or some people think that it's an early in development
2:38
separation of the Os odontoideum from the rest
2:43
of the odontoid process. This, however,
2:46
despite it being thought to be a congenital abnormality,
2:50
may be an unstable process.
2:53
You can see instability of the atlantoaxial joint, again,
2:57
between C1 and C2, which
3:00
can place the spinal cord at significant risk.
3:04
And usually what happens here is that the clinicians may do
3:08
flexion extension views to see whether there
3:10
is some anterior to posterior instability.
3:14
And that may be because the Os odontoideum is sticking with
3:20
the C1 vertebra as a functional
3:23
unit rather than the Os
3:25
odontoideum sticking with the lower
3:27
C2 as a functional unit.
3:29
So Orthotopic maintains its normal relationship with the
3:33
clivus and moves in unison with the atlas and axis.
3:37
Whereas, Dystopic Os lies in close proximity to the skull
3:41
base and moves as an extension of the clivus rather
3:45
than as an extension of C1 or C2.
3:49
So these are normal variations or variants that should
3:54
be reported because of the potential for instability.
3:58
And this is particularly true
4:00
in individuals who have had a trauma to the cervical spine.
4:04
On this MRI scan, knows that the patient has high signal
4:09
intensity in the spinal cord because it has been damaged,
4:12
because this is an unstable Os odontoideum.
David M Yousem, MD, MBA
Professor of Radiology, Vice Chairman and Associate Dean
Johns Hopkins University
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.