Use of MRA in Acute Stroke Imaging
HIDEInteractive Transcript
0:00
Today, we're going to discuss MRA
0:03
in acute stroke imaging.
0:05
So compared to CTA in the neck,
0:08
it's pretty equivalent to CTA for
0:10
identifying severe stenosis,
0:12
and it's better than CTA for identifying
0:16
subacute hemorrhage in the wall of the
0:18
dissection or in the false lumen.
0:21
CTA is better than MRA for hairline
0:23
residual lumen versus occlusion,
0:25
for delineating intravascular thrombus
0:27
for identifying residual patency and stents,
0:32
and for webs,
0:33
FMD and several other pathologies.
0:36
And then, as far as the head,
0:38
detection of large vessel occlusion,
0:40
contrast-enhanced MRA and gradient echo
0:43
combined are equivalent to CTA for
0:45
identifying large vessel occlusions.
0:46
In collateral circulation,
0:48
you can see on MRA,
0:49
but is probably better on CTA.
0:53
So as far as MR angiography in the head,
0:57
we typically get time-of-flight MRA.
0:59
It's about 80% to 90% sensitive
1:02
for large vessel occlusion.
1:05
There's some flow effects that can cause problems,
1:08
but pretty sensitive.
1:10
And then, contrast-enhanced MRA is greater
1:13
than 90% sensitive for detecting
1:16
large vessel occlusion.
1:18
CTA, the CTA shows good collaterals,
1:20
you can see them on MRA as well,
1:22
but CTA is probably better.
1:25
However, having said all this,
1:27
you can acquire this fast head and neck MRA,
1:31
and it's pretty good for delineating degree
1:34
of stenosis in the carotid and large vessel occlusion.
1:39
And this, combined with the gradient echo that
1:41
I showed you before, remember,
1:43
the SWI was greater than 90%.
1:45
The gradient echo is 70% to 90%.
1:47
The two in combination are equivalent to CTA
1:50
for detecting large vessel occlusion.
1:53
And then, this is just a paper showing the
1:56
differences between contrast-enhanced and
1:59
non-contrast-enhanced MRA in the head.
2:01
So, here's a time-of-flight MRA.
2:03
This patient has a distal ICA occlusion,
2:05
and what's happening is there's such slow
2:07
flow that the vessel gets saturated
2:09
out and you can't see it at all.
2:11
But on this time-resolved MRA,
2:13
so on this contrast-enhanced MRA,
2:16
you can see exactly where the occlusion is,
2:18
and the gradient echo also showed
2:20
where the occlusion is.
2:21
And this also matches what
2:22
you see on angiography.
2:23
So, the combination of a contrast-enhanced
2:25
and gradient echo is going to be equivalent
2:27
to CTA and angiography
2:30
for identifying the site of occlusion.
2:32
So, let's look at some cases.
Pamela W Schaefer, MD, FACR
Professor of Radiology, Vice Chair of Education
Massachusetts General Hospital
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.