Interactive Transcript
0:01
So, first we'll talk about non-contrast CT.
0:05
So, the three classic findings are loss
0:07
of gray-white differentiation, the insular
0:09
ribbon sign, and the hyperdense vessel sign.
0:12
I'm going to show you examples
0:14
of those on the upcoming cases.
0:16
Hypodensity on non-contrast CT is highly
0:18
specific for in part core, which means
0:21
hypodensity, that tissue is already dead.
0:25
The problem is detection requires a
0:27
substantial increase in tissue water.
0:29
That takes time.
0:30
So the sensitivity in the first
0:32
six hours is not very good.
0:33
It's only 45%.
0:35
You usually can't see small infarctions.
0:38
It improves with narrow windows.
0:40
Non-contrast CT is helpful for excluding other
0:43
causes of acute neurologic deficit, tumor, other
0:45
mass lesions, hemorrhage, vasogenic edema, etc.
0:49
It's also important for identifying
0:52
contraindications to IV thrombolysis.
0:54
So.
0:55
The major contraindication is
0:56
detection of intracranial hemorrhage.
0:59
It used to be that greater than one
1:00
third of the MCA region hypodensity was
1:03
a contraindication because that meant a
1:04
large infarction, but it's no longer a
1:07
contraindication based on a number of trials.
1:11
Now, the problem with non-contrast
1:12
CT is the findings are subtle.
1:15
And so you can't really measure the
1:17
volume of tissue that's dead on arrival.
1:19
So people use the ASPECT score and normal ASPECT
1:23
score is 10 and you take away one point or areas
1:26
of hyperdensity and they look at the CAUTI.
1:29
It went from nucleus, internal capsule,
1:32
insula, as well as the antere of temporal
1:34
lobe and the more posterior temporal lobe,
1:37
and then the anterior, more superior frontal
1:40
lobe, the frontal lobe in the region of
1:44
the motor strip, and, um, The parietal
1:47
lobe and the region of the sensory strip.
1:49
So for every abnormality,
1:52
you take away one point.
1:53
So patients who have an ASPECT score of
1:55
above six, six to eight or nine to 10
1:58
in this example have a better outcome
2:01
if they receive intra-arterial therapy.
2:04
Patients with a score of zero to five,
2:06
meaning they have a pretty big stroke in
2:08
this meta-analysis of five intra-arterial
2:11
trials did not show benefit of treatment.
2:14
It depends on the age of the
2:16
patient, the comorbidities.
2:17
This is just a guideline, but it really
2:20
depends on the individual patient when
2:21
the interventionists are making decisions.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.