This 5-week course includes the 25 essential cases a radiologist needs to master to
confidently diagnose prostate cancers on MRI.
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to:
- Interpret essential pathologies for prostate for MRI
- Conduct an assessment of prostate metrics, zones, and lesions
- Diagnose prostate conditions for MRI
- Create radiology reports that meet practical and stylistic PI-RADS 2.1 guidelines for the referring physicians
Bibliography: Suggested reading resources and references can be found within each case discussion.
MRI Online is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME)
to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Credit Designation Statement
MRI Online designates this Other activity for a maximum of 25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™.
Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
This activity is valid for credit from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022.
Content is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis.
Daniel Cornfeld, MD
Yale New Haven Hospital
Matthew Chanin, MD
CME Planning Committee
Jannette Collins, MD, MEd, FACR
Director of Medical Content
Suresh K. Mukherji, MD, MBA, FACR
Director of Head & Neck Radiology
Regional Medical Director
ENVISION Physician Services
Stephen J. Pomeranz, MD
Chief Medical Officer and Founder
David M. Yousem, MBA, MD
Professor of Radiology
Vice Chairman and Associate Dean
Johns Hopkins University
Daniel Arnold, MBA
CEO and Co-Founder
Senior Content Manager
Jennifer A. Hall, MS
Deanna M. Heier, PhD
VP, Educational Strategy and Operations
CME Planning Committee
The CME Planning Committee members have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
The Faculty for this activity have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Staff and Content reviewers
All MRI Online staff and reviewers involved in the development of content for this activity have no
relevant financial relationships to disclose.
There is no commercial support for this activity.
Course content is peer-reviewed for content validity by persons that do not have conflicts of interest related to
the content and to verify the educational material is evidence-based, fair, balanced, and free from commercial bias.