Interactive Transcript
2:00
It makes it very difficult for the person receiving
2:02
the report to know what exactly you mean.
2:04
If you give it a number 1 2 3 4 5 and we have
2:08
some data behind it, it allows everybody,
2:10
whether it's me and one center to another radiologist
2:13
in another country or another center or to a clinician,
2:16
they can all at least understand what we're saying. Even if we
2:19
might use different words in real life. In terms of content,
2:24
we want to make sure that we put all the relevant things that the
2:27
surgeons and clinicians that receive
2:28
our reports actually need.
2:30
So if we have a standard way of doing doing things, we won't
2:33
forget that because it prompts us during our dictation to
2:36
ensure we do that. And then in terms of data collection,
2:38
it's important that we standardize in terms of
2:41
literature so that we can do larger data aggregates
2:44
and figure out what's going on.
2:47
So LI-RADS was started in 20...
2:49
or the first version came out in 2011 and there have been a
2:52
few versions since. The most recent one is version 2018,
2:56
and we're working on a new version, which we do every three
2:58
years or so based on the literature.
3:00
This particular LI-RADS version has an ultrasound component,
3:06
contrast-enhanced ultrasound,
3:08
how to diagnose HCC, I'm not going to talk about that today.
3:11
I'll focus on the CT and MRI portion and then there's
3:15
a treatment response section for people who have undergone
3:18
local regional therapy, and I will touch on that today.
3:21
The important thing to remember for LI-RADS is
3:23
it's specifically to patients with cirrhosis
3:27
or who have chronic hepatitis B,
3:30
because we know that they have an increased risk of getting
3:32
hepatocellular carcinoma, even if they don't have cirrhosis.
3:36
LI-RADS does not apply to people who
3:38
don't have risk factors for HCC.
3:41
It does not apply to children at this point.
3:43
And it doesn't apply to people who have
3:45
vascular causes such as Budd–Chiari and HHT,
3:50
and cardiac congestion cirrhosis.
3:52
Because the imaging characteristics in these particular
3:56
subgroup of patients are two similar between HCC
4:00
and their various vascular abnormalities that they get.
4:04
This is a small subset of people who
4:06
have liver disease at risk for HCC,
4:08
but we have chosen to exclude them because
4:10
it causes too much overlap.
4:13
And one of the things that's really important with LI-RADS
4:15
is we have to be very specific with final diagnosis.
4:19
Particularly if you're calling something in HCC,
4:21
which would be LI-RADS 5, because it's one of the only imaging...
4:26
it's one of the only studies where the radiology
4:28
imaging report is enough to bypass biopsy,
4:32
and allow patients to undergo definitive therapy or
4:35
local regional therapy without actual pathology.
4:39
So it's really important that we be specific
4:41
in what we're talking about.
4:43
I'll just touch on the ultrasound portion.
4:45
So most patients when they first come in to the screening
4:49
setting, many are evaluated with ultrasound.
4:52
There are centers that do evaluate and screen people with CT,
4:56
but for most places in North America and Canada,
5:00
where I'm from, ultrasound is the first test and it's done every
5:04
six months in people with cirrhosis or at risk for HCC,
5:07
which includes patients with chronic hepatitis B.
5:11
So, the three options you have with your ultrasound is either
5:13
it's negative. So you see nothing.
5:15
You have a lesion that's less than 10 mm,
5:18
and that's called sub threshold.
5:20
And then, you have your type ultrasound version 3,
5:24
which is positive,
5:24
in which case these patients would be then recommended
5:27
to go on to CT or MRI for more definitive characterization.
5:32
The other one short thing about the ultrasound is that there's
5:36
visualization score because we know that in certain patients
5:39
who have cirrhosis, like the bottom image here,
5:41
there's a lot of attenuation of the sound and
5:43
we can't actually see the body, you know,
5:46
posterior half of the liver in this case.
5:48
So this would be a limited study,
5:50
the one on the bottom, compared to the one on the top.
5:53
And in this case,
5:54
we may actually be better off imaging this patient.
5:56
Whether it's screening or characterization with CT or MRI.
6:00
So this patient would not be somebody who should be
6:02
screened with ultrasound. Everybody else are fine.
6:07
Now, this is the algorithm for CT and MRI.
6:09
So patient comes in at risk for HCC.
6:12
You do the CT or the MRI and you apply this.
6:16
And this is part one.
6:18
And, of course,
6:18
remember they have to have HCC
6:21
and then this is the second part.
6:22
So first, I'll go back to this part.
6:25
So if you can't image, interpret
6:27
the images because they've missed a bunch of sequences,
6:29
the timings way off or the patient breathed, or coughed,
6:32
or whatever might have happened,
6:34
then you would characterize it, is not...
6:37
not characterizable.
6:39
And then it goes 1 and 2, which is benign.
6:42
And then there's this black one here,
6:44
called tumor in vein,
6:45
and that's really a bad prognostic factor for patients.
6:48
And this is really important for us to look for initially,
6:51
because it trumps everything else that we see below.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.