Interactive Transcript
0:01
So one of the questions that often comes up is
0:03
whether to use CT or MRI to follow patients with
0:07
Crohn's disease, or when to use either of these
0:10
modalities when trying to evaluate these patients.
0:13
And so, I'm going to go over a bit of the pros
0:14
and cons as I see them for these two different
0:17
important tools in evaluating Crohn's disease.
0:20
And obviously, we didn't spend much time talking about
0:22
CT since this is an MRI course, but it does certainly
0:26
have an important role for evaluating Crohn's and UC,
0:29
and so we need to at least discuss what the differences
0:32
are and why you might choose one over the other.
0:34
So obviously the radiation is a key factor,
0:37
and that becomes more important as you
0:39
have younger and younger patients,
0:40
which can often be the case in Crohn's disease.
0:42
So really considering MRI for
0:44
younger patients may be key.
0:46
One of the advantages of MRI is the fact that
0:48
you do get multiple time points versus the
0:50
single-shot appearance that you get with CT.
0:54
So this can be helpful for cases like stricture where
0:57
you're not sure on CT if it's a consistently narrowed
1:00
segment, or if it's narrowed on multiple sequences
1:03
over the course of 30 minutes like you get with MRI.
1:06
With that, you can be a lot more
1:07
confident that there's a true stricture.
1:10
The multiple different sequences really help you
1:12
evaluate whether things are acute versus chronic.
1:15
As you saw, there's a lot of different
1:16
tools we can use to make this determination.
1:18
Whereas with CT, you're really stuck with
1:21
thickening and enhancement, which are helpful,
1:24
but oftentimes not enough to really say with
1:27
confidence whether something is acute or chronic.
1:30
The excellent soft tissue contrast of MRI can be
1:32
helpful to find things such as edema, of course.
1:36
And you can get more information with MRI.
1:40
However, there sometimes are reasons to choose CT.
1:43
So of course, CT is much faster and
1:45
it's available in emergent situations.
1:47
It's technically very
1:49
straightforward and can be performed.
1:52
And most sites are straight out of the ER,
1:55
whereas MRI is more technically challenging
1:57
and requires a lot of expertise, both with
2:01
the technologists as well as the radiologists.
2:03
So hopefully after this you guys will feel comfortable
2:06
reading MRI, but you also need to have technologists
2:08
and a system in place that allows it to be performed.
2:12
CT is certainly less expensive, although
2:15
the differences aren't major anymore.
2:17
MRI does have the high cost associated
2:20
with it, at least historically.
2:22
CT has really good spatial resolution and it's
2:25
probably better than MRI, so potentially
2:28
seeing small strictures is a little better.
2:30
However, I find that this rarely comes into play in
2:33
being an important reason to choose CT. And then CT
2:37
is easy to see air, and it also has the advantage
2:40
that you don't have the air artifacts and other
2:42
artifacts that you have to deal with with MRI.
2:46
So my recommendations generally are to
2:49
use CT or MRI for initial evaluation,
2:52
whatever you're comfortable with.
2:53
And it depends a little bit on the urgency in
2:56
urgent cases coming out of the ER. Patients and
2:59
providers don't need it or want to wait for MRI.
3:01
And so using CT is certainly
3:03
appropriate in those cases.
3:05
MRI, however, I think is much
3:07
more helpful for follow-up.
3:09
When you're trying to monitor disease,
3:10
that acute versus chronic question
3:12
becomes much, much more important.
3:14
And also, don't forget these patients
3:16
are getting serial imaging and the
3:18
radiation starts to add up over time.
3:21
And that's why MRI really is a
3:23
critical tool for follow-up exams.
3:26
This is especially true in younger patients
3:28
who certainly can and do get Crohn's disease.
3:30
And then when you're trying to
3:32
evaluate for stricture, I prefer MRI.
3:34
Some other people may disagree, but I think the
3:36
multiple time points you get with MRI really help you
3:39
to be confident whether you have a stricture or not.
3:41
And then certainly if there's a question
3:44
of perianal disease, you can detect this on
3:46
CT, but MRI is much, much better for full
3:49
characterization and much easier to detect
3:53
perianal fistulas, abscesses, and other diseases.
3:56
And then lastly, you know, we didn't talk at all
3:58
about barium, but don't forget that it is available.
4:01
For troubleshooting, particularly in situations where
4:04
dynamic real-time imaging may be helpful to do things
4:07
such as delineate the complex nature of a fistula
4:11
and what's communicating with what, or potentially
4:14
confirming whether or not a stricture is real.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.