Interactive Transcript
0:00
Now to some technical aspects of cardiac
0:04
CT physics, notably kilovoltage, or kVp.
0:10
What is kVp?
0:12
It is a part of the strength of the
0:17
x-ray spectrum, the peak energy of it.
0:22
It determines dose, just as the milliamperes
0:26
does, except it determines dose
0:31
quadratically, meaning small changes
0:35
in kVp can lead to dramatic changes in dose.
0:39
And the default for most imaging is
0:42
often set at 120; for vascular, it's set at 100.
0:46
And so, I'm going to discuss the
0:48
significance of this entity in coronary imaging.
0:53
As I'm going to do that, I also want to show you
0:54
this particular graph, which on the y-axis, you see
0:58
the linear attenuation coefficient, which is this.
1:02
A log scale of the amount of x-ray attenuation and
1:07
by different tissues, and on the x-axis, you can
1:10
see the x-ray energy, and what you'll see in this
1:15
is that for most tissues, soft tissue, fat, there
1:23
isn't much difference between the attenuations.
1:27
In the typical energy range that we use.
1:31
So the typical energy range of CT
1:35
tissues aren't easily distinguishable.
1:38
And you know that from looking at the unenhanced
1:40
scans, how difficult it can be to distinguish tissues.
1:43
And that's why we give contrast, because the moment
1:47
we give contrast, you can see what happens is this
1:50
little peak and things start appearing different.
1:53
So the whole idea of giving contrast
1:56
is to make tissues appear different.
1:59
And it does so because the availability of iodine
2:02
changes the attenuation coefficient dramatically.
2:08
So, there are two elements of a kVp.
2:11
A kVp is kilovoltage; it gives you
2:14
the photons, the energy, increases the
2:19
average energy and the peak energy.
2:22
And a high kVp reduces the artifacts from
2:26
calcium and metal, artifacts that can
2:30
cause there to be blooming artifacts.
2:35
And a high kVp increases the number of photons
2:41
that go through and reduces the artifact.
2:44
That comes at a penalty.
2:45
First penalty is that you have increased dose.
2:51
And the second penalty is that you
2:53
have a slight reduction in contrast.
2:56
This is a little counterintuitive, but a
3:00
low kVp, what it does, it increases the
3:05
attenuation value from iodinated contrast.
3:10
We normally think about higher kVp
3:12
increasing attenuation values because
3:14
it increases the energy of the photons.
3:17
But here's a bit of a flip over here
3:19
where it's the low kVp that increases the
3:22
attenuation value from iodinated contrast.
3:25
And why it does that is because the lower the
3:28
kVp, the more chances you have of incurring
3:34
what's known as the photoelectric effect.
3:37
So you don't have to rely on, um, the two
3:40
types of, uh, methods of getting x-rays.
3:47
One is a photoelectric effect and the other one
3:49
is a Compton scatter. The photoelectric effect is very
3:52
powerful, a lot more energy in it, but you really
3:55
need to approach what's known as the K-edge energy.
3:58
So, the closer the kVp is to the
4:01
K-edge—so 80 is closer than 120—
4:05
um, the more bang for the iodinated buck you'll get.
4:09
Now, all of this is automated, so now scanners
4:11
can actually decide what the optimal kVp is.
4:14
But in the event that you can't,
4:16
then think about the patient.
4:17
If the patient is young and you want
4:20
to minimize radiation dose, then you
4:23
can choose a lower kVp, an 80 or a 70.
4:27
And if the patient has a stent, has metal, has
4:30
calcium, then go towards the higher kVp, 120 kVp.
4:35
So aside from the reduction of the radiation
4:38
dose, which is really quite a quadratic
4:40
reduction, so going from 100 to 80 kVp
4:45
reduces radiation dose by 50 percent.
4:48
Aside from that, the other thing you can do is
4:50
reduce the contrast volume that you can give.
4:53
So let's say that the standard protocol
4:55
is to give 100 mL of iodinated
4:57
contrast of a certain density like 317.
5:03
If you lower the kVp to 80 or 70, you can get away
5:07
with giving 50 mL, and that's obviously valuable
5:09
in patients who have renal impairment because of
5:12
the possibility of contrast-induced nephropathy.
5:16
So does it make a difference?
5:17
No.
5:17
It makes a huge difference.
5:20
I should say it makes a small difference,
5:22
which makes a large difference.
5:23
The top images you can see were both
5:27
taken of the same anatomical part.
5:30
Everything is the same.
5:31
The patient's the same.
5:32
One is 100 kVp, one is 120.
5:36
Um, A is brighter than B, so it
5:39
won't surprise you that A is 100 kVp.
5:42
The bottom image shows the, um, curved planar
5:46
reformation of the RCA taken at 100 kVp, um, 80 kVp.
5:54
80 kVp is on the left, 100 kVp is on the right.
5:58
So you can see the difference it makes.
6:01
Uh, here is a more systematic analysis of the dose
6:04
and contrast volume, and you'll see that as the
6:09
kVp reduces, let's say from 120 to 80, dramatic
6:13
reduction in the dose, quite a huge reduction.
6:17
And the other thing to notice is, as the kVp
6:21
reduces, the volume of contrast also goes down.
6:25
So it's one of the few win-win situations we have in
6:28
imaging, this is one of them, where low kVp,
6:31
as long as it's arterial imaging, does two things.
6:35
It lowers the contrast volume needed,
6:38
and it reduces the dose as well.
6:41
When it comes to penalties, there's more
6:42
noise, and obviously if you have calcium
6:46
or stents, then there's a problem because
6:48
you're going to get beam hardening from it.
6:51
Thank you.
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.