65-year-old woman with history of left breast cancer 12 years ago. Annual follow up
HIDEInteractive Transcript
0:00
And our next patient is a 65-year-old
0:03
woman with a history of left breast cancer
0:05
12 years ago, for a routine follow-up.
0:10
So here are the CC and MLO views for this
0:14
patient, and she has had a lumpectomy on
0:17
the left, so her scar is marked with that
0:20
interrupted line sticker, and so this is
0:23
her lumpectomy scar and her lumpectomy site.
0:27
And we compared to earlier prior mammograms.
0:32
Looking at that same lumpectomy site,
0:36
there was a feeling, you know,
0:38
even though she had a lot of distortion back
0:41
here, it looks as if the lumpectomy site
0:43
maybe became a little bit more dense.
0:46
And then on the MLO view, there's a lot of
0:49
distortion back here and on her prior exam,
0:52
but it looks like compared to the new one, the current
0:56
study, the lumpectomy site looks more bulky.
1:00
So a lumpectomy site, even if there's
1:02
really significant distortion,
1:05
it should stay the same over time,
1:07
or maybe the scar retracts a little bit.
1:11
We may see some calcifications forming,
1:13
but usually either things stay the
1:14
same or they get better appearing.
1:17
You know, there's an improvement in the appearance
1:19
of the scar over time, and we don't want to see
1:22
the scar looking more bulky or more prominent.
1:26
So just looking at this in the tomosynthesis
1:29
images, you can see that as we scroll
1:33
through, there's some calcifications there
1:37
at the lumpectomy site, and there's also
1:39
this extra sort of bulky tissue at the
1:42
posterior aspect of that lumpectomy site.
1:46
And on the CC view, you know, lots of
1:50
calcifications there and some extra
1:52
bulkiness to that lumpectomy site.
1:57
And just scrolling through,
2:00
there's some calcifications that
2:02
are sort of fine linear branching.
2:04
They don't belong there.
2:06
It's not our typical dystrophic
2:08
looking calcification.
2:09
And then it looks like there may be more
2:12
mass-like tissue there at the lumpectomy.
2:16
And it's definitely difficult
2:18
to look at lumpectomy sites.
2:21
Because they can be very distorted,
2:25
but they shouldn't look worse over time.
2:28
So we ended up doing some extra views
2:32
with ultrasound.
2:34
So we went to ultrasound and lumpectomy
2:37
site can be very difficult to evaluate
2:39
with ultrasound because there's a lot
2:41
of hypoechoic scarring at the site anyway.
2:46
And you may not really have a comparison, but we
2:49
knew where the scar was on the patient's skin.
2:52
And it just looked like there was more
2:54
mass than we would expect when we scrolled
2:57
through, so we thought this was probably
2:59
new, and there was some blood flow to it.
3:05
Here was the scar coming from her skin,
3:08
but then this seemed to be extra tissue.
3:11
We also looked at her axillary lymph nodes.
3:15
There's a lymph node here with a very thin cortex.
3:18
And there's a lymph node here
3:19
with a much thicker cortex.
3:22
So, our recommendation was to biopsy
3:24
this mass, and we biopsied the
3:28
lymph node with the thicker cortex.
3:30
And this was invasive ductal carcinoma in
3:33
the breast and metastatic carcinoma involving
3:37
that lymph node, where the cortex was thicker.
Lisa Ann Mullen, MD
Assistant Professor; Breast Imaging Fellowship Director
Johns Hopkins Medicine
© 2024 Medality. All Rights Reserved.